The Right Angle

The Changeling

John McCain vs. Barack Obama is, at bottom, a smart vs. stupid election.

Obama himself may not be a moron, but his supporters are defined by their naïve vision, their inability to grasp how the world really works, their devotion to theory over fact. Obama is the candidate of the Saturday morning cartoon, the children’s fairy tale, the Disney happy ending. McCain is the candidate of reality—but how many Americans want to face reality?

The outcome of McCain vs. Obama will signal to the rest of the world where America wants to go. If Obama wins, it will inform the world that America really does have an inferiority complex, and that it now prefers to model itself after Europe. If McCain wins, the rest of the world will know that America still regards itself as exceptional, unique, different.

If Obama wins, we’ll know that our country took no lasting lessons from the Johnson and Carter years, and that left-wingers simply have to wait for the passage of time before they can once again seize Executive Branch power. If McCain wins, we’ll know that the old values still mean something—not the old values of racism, as the left will undoubtedly claim, but the old values of honor, courage, dignity, sacrifice, decency.

Obama’s supporters speak of change—but what change can this child of a candidate possibly provide? His mind has been contaminated with extremist liberal thought. He has never crossed party lines in a meaningful manner. He is merely a well-spoken ideologue, a more refined Jesse Jackson.

Obama is a hallucination, a cipher absent of substance and gravitas. He is eerily similar to the last Democrat we elected President. Why would thinking people want to replicate past mistakes?

Non-thinking people don’t know any better: this, of course, is what Obama is exploiting. Obama is a classic grifter, a confidence man who promises diamonds before delivering pebbles. His urban supporters in particular will be just as hope-deprived at the end of his administration as they were at the end of Clinton’s two terms. Nothing will change.

“Obama ‘08” signs can now be found throughout America’s economically distressed neighborhoods—neighborhoods filled with voters who do not realize how skillfully they have been hustled. Obama has seduced them and will betray them: his urban advocates have yet to learn that those of Obama’s political class ultimately bear responsibility for their hopeless plight.

These neighborhoods are filled with nominal Christians who, so we are told, abhor abortion and the secular culture. Why, then, have they thrown their support behind Obama, the most radically pro-abortion candidate in US history and a man embraced by the icons of amoral popular culture? Ignorance is the only explanation.

Obama is ruthless in his exploitation of these people. He has nothing in common with his urban supporters—but, as he showed in Illinois, he is a genius at taking advantage of their lack of sophistication in order to obtain and maintain political power. Obama rehearsed his act in Illinois for years. Now, it’s time for his concert to begin in earnest.

Obama will receive unprecedented support from urban America: these voters have been led to believe that Obama is the heir to the legacy of Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, Nelson Mandela, Frederick Douglass, Harriet Tubman and other such leaders. To rational people, linking Obama with these accomplished leaders is BS—but nothing is rational in urban America, thanks to the Democrat Party.

Urban America is already being told that McCain is a bigot and a fascist, a hater of those not of his kind, a devil in a suit. It’s an old message. Urban America was once told that “twelve years of Reagan-Bush” caused the 1992 Los Angeles riots. Urban America was once told that Richard Nixon and George Wallace were one and the same. Urban America was told that George W. Bush didn’t care about black people. Urban America bought this stuff before, and urban America will once again buy it in November.

Urban America’s overwhelming support could help make Obama the next President of the United States. Of course, Obama will pay lip service to these voters, while delivering the goods for his real constituents—antiwar radicals, labor unions, defenders of Roe v. Wade, trial lawyers, the environmental lobby, etc. They will get everything; urban America will get nothing…and urban America won’t even realize it.

As I said, this is a smart vs. stupid election.
Technorati: Republicans , Bush , Politics , Conservative , GOP
Here's a sampling of the 17 comments and 0 trackbacks submitted by Human Events readers.
Comment from:  surfcitysteven
Don't get out much anymore, eh Tuck? Walked around anywhere in America lately? This country is as sad as I have ever seen it. And you want 4 more years of these policies that caused this. At what point to you consider yourself an American. We know being a republican is the most improtant thing to you.
Posted: 06/22/2008 10:07am
Permalink
Comment from:  jprescott
There is an irony to your posting about how this is a smart vs. stupid election and then a) pointing how how Urban America will get nothing from an Obama presidency and b) linking that particular former blog entry.

In it, you observed that "Clinton’s election may be looked upon as a golden age for some Americans, but for conservatives it was a nightmare."

If Senator Obama's so much like President Clinton was, and Clinton's election was looked upon as a golden age for some Urban Americans, then it is no wonder that they would support Obama. Further, they would be stupid not to - while Obama may not be able to do much for them, he, at least, notices the needs are there. Senator McCain offers NOTHING to Urban America. Even your blog excoriating Urban America for its stupidity presents no reason to be FOR McCain, merely reasons that you believe being for Obama is dumb.

But even that is not the most ironic part of your self-reference.

In the earlier blog, you puzzle about why conservative voters are not coalescing around the McCain nomination. "How can they be so short-sighted," you wonder.

Which voters are the stupid ones? The ones who will vote for the candidate who most reflects their views or the ones who will not do so?
Posted: 06/22/2008 10:11am
Permalink
Comment from:  Adam Franklin
"If McCain wins, we’ll know that the old values still mean something—not the old values of racism, as the left will undoubtedly claim, but the old values of honor, courage, dignity, sacrifice, decency."

Decency? After returning from being a POW, McCain left his then-wife, who waited for him for years and was in a car accident resulting in permanent injuries, in order to marry his current wife, a rich beer-distributor heiress. He saw the money, saw the young pretty wife, and left his faithful wife in order to pursue his own selfish goals. is this the kind of decency to which you are referring Tuck? I notice you never come on the comments section to defend your own inane posts. You simply get on your soapbox once a week or so and spout off about random issues with no factual or logical support. You make such easily debunkable assertions without realizing the holes in your argument and at least trying to shore them up.

You are, in short, the same as most other republick politicians out there, high on righteous indignation and scorn for 'the other', while short on self-reflection and evaluation. In other words, you have no character.
Posted: 06/22/2008 10:37am
Permalink
Comment from:  Sam Spiro
You say Obama has nothing in common with his urban supporters? Lol, who does your research for your Tuck? Sean Hannity? After graduating from HARVARD LAW, Obama turned down the opportunity to work for corporate america in exhange for working as an urban community organizer, to actually try to HELP urban communities and DO SOME GOOD. Sure, he may not have been born in the ghetto, but he knows what it is to not be born with a silver spoon in his mouth, a la, Mr. Son of a Navy Admiral McCain. He actually had to WORK to get where he is today, instead of McCain who either a) used his family connections (same as Shrub) or b) married into wealth.

Your posts are usually pretty stupid, but this one is especially so, and shows you for the poor, sad, fool that you are.

Posted: 06/22/2008 10:43am
Permalink
Comment from:  misanthopicus
How do you dare to speak in such terms about mister Glibama!
Don't you realize that he has the support of the finest and most intelligent demographic of this country?
Didn't you - yet - hear that mister Glibama has just nailed Hannah Montana's and Tele Tubbies' endorsements?
Don't you realize that we're gonna be liked again? In Pakistan? In Libya? In Rwanda? In Venezuela? In Malibu? In Berkeley, california? By the Los Angeles Times editorial board? That the Acaloufs will like us again?
You rotten right-wing member who doesn't care about being liked and plan to inflict Algebra I upon 12 grade diversity members! Shame!
Posted: 06/22/2008 03:46pm
Permalink
Add a comment | View All

(Unsubscribe any time. Read our Privacy Policy.)

Browse The Right Angle Archives:

<  November 2009  >
 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
View Week            1
View Week2 3 4 5 6 7 8
View Week9 10 11 12 13 14 15
View Week16 17 18 19 20 21 22
View Week23 24 25 26 27 28 29
View Week30

Blog Roll:

Human Events Blog Roll:
Right Angle Home
Rightometer
Hillary Watch
Capital Briefs
Gizz-ette
The Ballot Box
Conservative Booknotes
Human Events U
Other Great Conservative Blogs The Ballot Box's Best Bets Human Events U Cheat Sheet

RSS Syndication:

RSS 0.92: Posts, Comments
RSS 1.0: Posts, Comments
RSS 2.0: Posts, Comments
Atom 0.3: Posts, Comments

What is RSS?
Advertise | Manage Your Account | Privacy Policy