The Right Angle

Coulter's the Hammer; Liberals Her Nail

The Baltimore Sun's Jonathan Pitts interviewed HUMAN EVENTS Legal Affairs Correspondant Ann Coulter in Sunday's magazine. He writes,

In Godless, Coulter argues that the left, with its generally secular worldview, has adopted a de facto religion of its own. The adherents of this faith, liberalism, treat those who question its "sacraments" (abortion, evolution, public education) as heretics.

Do the very ideas enrage you? If so, Coulter may be pleased. "Provocation is the essence of persuasion," she told The Sun three years ago.

Jonathan Freedland of the British newspaper The Guardian concludes that she may, in the end, be less about politics than the sheer, American magnitude of her spectacle.

"She has a magnetism that sets her apart from the bulk of the talking-head industry," he wrote. "Once you see her, it's hard to look away. Like a train wreck or a prize fight, something about Ann Coulter makes you sit up and look."


In the Q&A, Pitt's incisive questions allow Coulter's wit and wisdom to shine. Some highlights:

You often speak and write in a way that seems calculated to press the buttons of your audience. What are the pluses and the downsides of this approach?

My thinking is that only trauma produces intellectual breakthroughs. The plus side is watching liberals get hissy; the downside is - there really is no downside.

Your books and columns attack liberal thinking, but what, in the long run, are you trying positively to assert? What would Ann Coulter's America look like?

I'm exposing liberal ideology for the pack of lies it is. What people do with that information is up to them, although one would hope it might come in handy on Election Day. My ideal America would have no liberals and 7-gallon flush toilets in every bathroom.

You're often described as "divisive" and "mean-spirited," yet you describe yourself as a serious Christian. Is this a contradiction?

I'm a Christian first and a mean-spirited, bigoted conservative second, and don't you ever forget it. You know who else was kind of "divisive" in terms of challenging the status quo and the powers-that-be of his day? Jesus Christ.

Does polemical writing like yours widen the Red State-Blue State schism?

The imminence of conservative victory has driven liberals to insanity. Have I contributed to this? Gosh, I hope so.

How'd you develop your writing style? What are your daily writing habits?

I do what comes naturally. I write the things that would cause belly laughter among my right-wing friends when having after-dinner liquor. I usually get up at noon, check the Drudge Report, carefully read the Treason Times, do a little writing, chat with my friends until midnight, write for another three hours and then collapse into bed at 4 a.m. Book tours completely ruin this idyllic schedule.


Technorati: Republicans , Bush , Politics , Conservative , GOP
Here's a sampling of the 11 comments and 1 trackbacks submitted by Human Events readers.
Comment from:  godsuck
One thing about, she's made being a liberal and an atheist cool!! I feel like one of those bad a** kids in high school

Not to mention she's a liar.

This is copied and pasted directly from her web site:

In fact, students are actually required to wear "Creationism Is Shameful" T-shirts in Dover, Pa., where -- thanks to a lawsuit by the ACLU -- the liberal clergy have declared Darwinism the only true church, immunized from argument. Ye shall put no other God before it. Not one.

No one in his/her right (no pun intended) mind couldn't
see thru that one.
Posted: 08/01/2006 12:15pm
Permalink
Comment from:  godsuck
My ideal America would have no liberals and 7-gallon flush toilets in every bathroom.

Sounds like Hilter's ideal Germany with no Jews.

I knew it, I knew it!!! Scratch a right winger and you get a Nazi...you people are beginning to show your true colors
Posted: 08/01/2006 03:19pm
Permalink
Comment from:  rightdiva
Er. I'm interested "godsuck." You seem to be indignant about an alleged parallel between Ann Coulter and Hitler. It's unoriginal, to be sure, but so you are you, probably. Ho hum. Yet another angry liberal.

Anyway, I wonder, since you are so appalled by Nazisim, where you stand on the whole conflict between Hezbollah and Israel? I wonder if you staunchly support the right of a sovereign and democratic nation to defend itself? Or, do you decry Israel's aggression and argue the moral equivalence between Israel's army and Hezbollahs terror tactics. In fact, I suspect you feel Hezbollah has every right to strike at Israel and cheer them on along with your other heros, Chavez, Castro, Ahmedinijad and your dead buddy Che Guevara.

I don't recall Ann Coulter ever calling for the annihilation of Israel or the Jewish people (though your buddy Ahmedinijad does that every day). She merely hopes for a world where people are not as ignorant and naive as you.
Posted: 08/01/2006 04:08pm
Permalink
Comment from:  ecarver530
the difference between Coulter's plan with liberals and Hitler's plan with Jews is that Hitler wanted to round them up and kill them the most efficient way possible. Coulter wants to expose liberal lies and force them to abandon their radical, kook, dangerous agenda. Yet liberals cannot abandon any opportunity to liken a bold conservative with a megalomaniac! How many conservatives are calling Al Franken, Micahael Moore, or John Kerry Adolf Hitler? We have class and, more importantly, knowledge! No liberals are equitable w/ Hitler, nor are any conservatives.
Posted: 08/01/2006 09:58pm
Permalink
Comment from:  godsuck
PinkyFink: I'm "unoriginal"? Heaven's forfend!! I notice you aren't questioning my points. Also, I hate to disappoint you, but Castro is a murderer, Che was a murderer, Amhedinijad is, at the very least, a murderer wannbe in terms of Israel. I don't want to be friends with any of them, any more than you would want to be friends with Hilter.

ecarver350: First of all, I don''t regard her or her supporters as "conservative". Thats an insult to the memory of a man of integrity like Barry Goldwater. Right Wing nut job is a more appropriate term.

The similarity between Coulter's and Hitler's plan is that they both want to get rid of people they don't happen to like for whatever reason. Instead of ethnic cleansing, she wants some sort of idealogical cleansing.

Also, are her lies (see my first post) OK but "liberal lies" aren't? There are liars everywhere. You have "class and knowledge". Gee, do you think that you could be considered an unbiased observer. Aren't you a little taken with yourself?
Posted: 08/02/2006 12:20pm
Permalink
Add a comment | View All

(Unsubscribe any time. Read our Privacy Policy.)

Browse The Right Angle Archives:

<  July 2010  >
 Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat Sun
View Week      1 2 3 4
View Week5 6 7 8 9 10 11
View Week12 13 14 15 16 17 18
View Week19 20 21 22 23 24 25
View Week26 27 28 29 30 31  

Blog Roll:

Human Events Blog Roll:
Right Angle Home
Rightometer
Hillary Watch
Capital Briefs
Gizz-ette
The Ballot Box
Conservative Booknotes
Human Events U
Other Great Conservative Blogs The Ballot Box's Best Bets Human Events U Cheat Sheet

RSS Syndication:

RSS 0.92: Posts, Comments
RSS 1.0: Posts, Comments
RSS 2.0: Posts, Comments
Atom 0.3: Posts, Comments

What is RSS?
Advertise | Manage Your Account | Privacy Policy