Guns & Patriots

Gun Review: Ruger LCR

Let me admit my bias up front: I’m a Smith & Wesson kind of guy.  I’ve owned and carried many of their handguns both on and off-duty. The first handgun I ever bought was a model 10 heavy barrel that rode in a Safariland holster for more than two years before my department moved to the Glock 17. 

It doesn’t mean that I don’t carry or appreciate other firearms. If you see me out and about, I’ve likely got a Glock 19 on my hip. If I am on the job, you will see a SIG SAUER P226 in the holster. But I always have a hammerless Smith on my person. Always.

When the Ruger LCR was introduced in 2009, I was intrigued. Here was a revolver being introduced at a time when the semi-auto pistol is king. Plus, going head-to-head with Smith & Wesson in the pocket revolver market was a bold move.

But, several years later, the LCR has carved out a significant niche in the market, and Ruger continues to introduce new models of the handgun to meet consumer demand. Having shot several LCR revolvers, I understand why this little gun is thriving in the current market.

LCR

The LCR, or “Lightweight Compact Revolver,” is a hammerless, snub-nose handgun. The initial LCR was available only in .38 Special (+P rated), but newer models are available in both .22 LR and .357 Magnum.

The LCR blends elements of the traditional small-framed revolver with the advancements of modern polymer guns. The Ruger LCR has a steel cylinder and barrel, an aluminum frame, and a polymer handle. The unloaded weight on the standard LCR is less than 14 ounces.
The cylinder has recesses so significant that fluting would appear to be a monumental understatement. When every ounce counts, shaving every bit of steel off the cylinder can help lighten the load. It definitely gives the LCR a distinctive look.

The polymer section holds all of the fire control components. When introduced, the polymer handle on a revolver was a novel idea.  However, in the past several years, both Smith & Wesson and Taurus have introduced polymer-handled revolvers.

The front sight is relatively large for such a small handgun, and is easy to pick up in the wide rear notch.The serrated front ramp is pinned offering an easy swap to another sight if so desired. In fact, an XS Sights “Standard Dot” tritium sight is a factory option on the LCR.

Specifications:
•    Calibers: .38 Special (+P), .357 Magnum, .22 LR
•    Capacity:  5 rounds (.38 Special, .357 Magnum), 8 rounds (.22 LR)
•    Weight:  13.0 − 17.1 ounces depending on caliber and options
•    Options:  Crimson Trace Lasergrips, XS Sights Standard Dot front sight
•    MSRP:  $525 – $869

Range Time

The balance of the gun is very nice. The weight is shifted forward, toward the muzzle, which appears to help with recoil. Shooting standard pressure .38 Hornady 125gr JHPs, the gun’s recoil was very mild. Speer Gold Dot 135 grain +P rounds are snappier.However, both loads were easier on the hand than similar loads shot in my 642.

Very lightweight 125 grain LRN and 148 grain WC were easy to shoot and accuracy was reasonable. I did not notice any bullet tumble as I have seen in some other short barrel revolvers with light loads.

The trigger is very smooth with no perceptible staging, and presses straight back. Compared to Ruger’s SP101, the LCR’s trigger feels like a slick, custom job. 

The LCRs I have shot have a much smoother trigger than what is on my stock Smith and Wesson 642. Ruger has a patented friction-reducing cam in the fire control system that is largely responsible for the very smooth pull. I’ve had the chance to shoot several LCR revolvers, and each of them have an excellent trigger.

The only complaint I had with the trigger is my tendency to short stroke it. If you ride the trigger out, feeling for a reset, you will likely short stroke this gun. You must allow the trigger to fully reset before pressing again. 

This is not likely a problem for most people, and it is a minor training issue for me. Blame my years of shooting heavy-spring S&W revolvers, I suppose.

Bottom Line

The bottom line is I am impressed. Ruger is making a very nice, very concealable revolver in a variety of calibers. Some people may not like the modern look of the gun, but I was not put off by it.  In person it is a neat little gun, and I expect it will continue to sell very well.

I do not hesitate to recommend the LCR to anyone in the market for a compact revolver. It is easy shooting, affordable and dependable.  As a back up gun or concealed carry piece, it will fit the bill nicely.

Sign Up
  • GrimmCreeper

    Is anyone aware of a good (reasonably priced) OWB holster for the Ruger LCR? I am looking to use this gun for concealed carry. I’m looking for strong-side hip, not a paddle.  

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/6N6JF2TWEJTSI352WGR3HV7Y24 gardner

     i use a don hume brand ‘yaqui’ style holster and it works very well. it is the ‘jit’ model. it conceals the gun better than anything i’ve tried.

  • TheBitterClinger1

    A  13.0 − 17.1 ounce 357 magnum? Perhaps the younger, stronger set ;-) . Personally I would stick with the .38 spl. But as with the author I am a Smith & Wessonite- carry two j-frames – saves on reloading time. But Ruger does make some interesting handguns to be sure.

  • paperpushermj

    Can you give us more reviews on Wheel Guns?

  • Guest

     They will charge you if they don’t get the replaced part which of course happens rarely.  I think Ruger is best as well, I would carry my Redhawk  51/2  if needed for work, makes an incredible club if you don’t have to shoot your opponent

  • theo980

    Personally I’d get the .357.  It handles .38 also.

  • Guest

     I like inside the pants…..I’m a chub though, I would use the paddle for my Redhawk mentioned above…

  • JohnnyRaven

    The LCR is what I am willing to carry. Heavier guns sag under my beer belly and love handles and
    are not comfortable. There are some options. Under the shirt suspenders help and don’t attract attention.

  • GrimmCreeper

    Thanks gents. IWB is not an option. Too much stress on the belt holes already. I’ll check out the Don Hume.

  • LUKE_SKY_WALKER

    http://www.judicialwatch. org/blog/2012/04/dhs-to-grant-illegal-aliens-unlawful-presence-waivers/
    DHS To Grant Illegal Aliens “Unlawful Presence Waivers”
    In its quest to implement stealth amnesty, the Obama Administration is working behind the scenes to halt the deportation of certain illegal immigrants by granting them “unlawful presence waivers.” The new measure would apply to illegal aliens who are relatives of American citizens. Here is how it would work, according to a Department of Homeland Security (DHS) announcement posted in today’s Federal Register, the daily journal of the U.S. government; the agency will grant “unlawful presence waivers” to illegal aliens who can prove they have a relative that’s a U.S. citizen.
    Currently such aliens must return to their native country and request a waiver of inadmissibility in an existing overseas immigrant visa process. In other words, they must enter the U.S. legally as thousands of foreigners do on a yearly basis. Besides the obvious security issues, changing this would be like rewarding bad behavior in a child. It doesn’t make sense. But the system often causes U.S. citizens to be separated for extended periods from their immediate relatives,” according to the DHS. The proposed changes, first announced in January, will significantly reduce the length of time U.S. citizens are separated from their loved ones while required to remain outside the United States during the current visa processing system. The administration also claims that relaxing the rule will also “create efficiencies for both the U.S. government and most applicants.” How exactly is not listed in the Federal Register announcement, which gives the public 60 days to comment. That’s only a formality since the DHS has indicated that the change is pretty much a done deal. This appears to be part of the Obama Administration’s bigger plan to blow off Congress by using its executive powers to grant illegal immigrants backdoor amnesty. The plan has been in the works for years and in 2010 Texas’s largest newspaper published an exposé about a then-secret DHS initiative that systematically cancelled pending deportations. The remarkable program stunned the legal profession and baffled immigration attorneys who said the government bounced their clients’ deportation even when expulsion was virtually guaranteed.In late 2011 a mainstream newspaper obtained internal Homeland Security documents outlining “sweeping changes” in immigration enforcement that halt the deportation of illegal aliens with no criminal records. This also includes a nationwide “training program” to assure that enforcement agents and prosecuting attorneys don’t remove illegal immigrants who haven’t been convicted of crimes. Judicial Watch has been a front runner in investigating the Obama Administration’s stealth amnesty program by pursuing DHS records concerning “deferred action” or “parole” to suspend removal proceedings against a particular group of individuals. Last spring JW sued DHS to obtain information because the agency ignored a federal public records request that dates back to July 2010.
    Read more about Department of Homeland Security, illegal immigration, Obama

  • AKgunguy

    Well, there could be an aguement about who makes better. As far as 1911′s go
    ruger is just entering market. Theirs is nice, yes, but I still like my 2 Springfield’s
    much more. Then you get into the High ends like baer, and W.C. and there is no comparison. My Wilson CQB is the smoothest piece I have ever shot.(except of course other Wilsons)

    A sfar as the M77 MK II. yeah it’s got what it needs, most notably a Control feed bolt, not a push feed. Wnchester and Kimber both have CF bolts as well and there is a reason they cost about one third again the price of a ruger. Accurqcy from the 77′s is not as consistantly, top end as the 2 I listed.

  • http://www.facebook.com/TheRockefeller Chris Grant

    The .38+P version of the LCR is BY far one of the most difficult handguns to control I’ve ever shot…and I’m nowhere near a newb to handguns by any stretch. I find it easier to control a 10mm for example, than the snubbie beast varieties of the LCR.
    I would not recommend one to anyone, but the S&W Airweights  instead, much better control overall.

  • LUKE_SKY_WALKER

    GUT BUSTING HILARIOUS I PROMISE!!POLITICALLY CORRECT IN THE 16TH CENTURY, HILARIOUS, MUST SEE!!
    http://whiterabbitradio. net/how-whites-took-over-america-2

  • LUKE_SKY_WALKER

         GUT BUSTING HILARIOUS I PROMISE!!POLITICALLY CORRECT IN THE 16TH CENTURY, HILARIOUS, MUST SEE!!http://whiterabbitradio. net/how-whites-took-over-america-2

  • franknowzad

    This pistol could have walked out of Bill FAIRBAIRN’S book, “Shooting to Live” section on concealed pistols. In FAIRBAIRNS day they had to file off most of the hammer.

  • FellowAmerican

    I own the LCR and agree with this review. An important additional point is (like most all calibers) that there is some terrific, powerful ammunition on the market. With the right +P ammo, this little wheel gun is quite powerful for a .38 (I use Cor-Bon) and it’s a good example of how far concealed carry weapons and ammo have advanced. Just compare it to the old snub nose .38′s that a lot of NYPD Detectives used as their primary weapon in the ’70s and ’80s.

    I wear the LCR on my ankle in a neoprene holster or in my boot when riding my motorcycle and it’s pretty comfortable.