Strongest case against Romney a few sheets short of a ream

Major Key Steps to Cause America’s Collapse:1) Discredit the Constitution
2) Embolden American’s enemies
3) Discourage American’s Allies
4) Let down defenses by cutting military support
5) Increase spending enough to cause bankruptcy
6) Put an end to the free market by increasing government regulations
7) Polarize by causing hate and discontent among citizens
8) Stop and Prevent energy independence
9) Create doubt and fear over America’s futureHussein Obama has achieved his goals and more.Are you satisfied with the direction of our country?

Amen…

The lady doth protest too much…can we concentrate on the real enemy..the American Liberal..which is taking us into a post Constitution era…
This guy knew about liberals before they were liberals..he was one of a
kind…A person who knows what the truth is ,is all that matters right now..

http://theothermccain.com/2012/01/14/the-duke/

It seems children use to be alot wiser as
well…

From the New York “Daily News” Nov 4th
1949

DEMOCRATIC DIALOG
Father, must I go to work?No, my lucky son.We’re living now on Easy StreetOn
dough from Washington
We’ve left it up to Uncle Sam so don’t get
exercised.Nobody has to give a damn We’ve all been subsidized.
But if Sam treats us all so well And feeds us milk and honey,Please, daddy,
tell me what the hell He’s going to use for money.
Don’t worry, bub,
there’s not a hitch In this here noble plan He simply soaks the filthy
rich And helps the common man.
But, father, won’t there come a
time When they run out of cash And we have left them not a dime When
things will go to smash?
My faith in you is shrinking, son,You nosy
little brat; You do too damn much thinking, son,To be a
Democrat

Ann…companies like Bain have been around for sometime…people lose jobs in any restructuring of a company that’s failing….from the numbers I’ve seen Bain had a 80% success rate…go after the real “bain” of this country….progressivism ….

Old Gingrich must be feeling good about his campaign again because he brought the Eyes of Newt out to the Podium today. 

If she ever blinks I’ll do a back flip over my recliner.  LOL!!!

Thanks PB! I’m just getting tired of having Romney, or anyone else for that matter shoved down my throat. Then, I always do weary of the mudslinging.

Predictions soundly based on 2 months of navigating cult-of-personality messages on this board by Coulter and other Mitt Rahmney acolytes:Mittsies will fantasize endlessly about Mitt’s prospects for winning, his positioning, his character and achievements even as they personally disparage critics and criticism without benefit of corroboration or substantiation other than their own assumed authority, generally rendered anonymously.  They will unswervingly respond to facts and substantive arguments about Mitt’s political and character flaws either by charging the purveyors of those facts and arguments with anti-Mormon bigotry, with taking facts and quotes out of context, with dishonesty, or with being secret evangelical or Obama agents. Or they will deflect or ignore.  They will seldom if ever offer any back-up to such claims. They will virtually never show how something was taken out of context or has been doctored or misrepresented. To ask for sourcing and substantiation is futile.  In the scattered instances where Mittsies pretend to source their allegation, the sources will turn out to be liberal sites or totally unknown outlets that cannot be easily checked out and therefore offer no actual credibility.  Mittsies will not engage on important matters like Mitt’s two losing campaigns and and being forced to relinquish a second term as governor because of  his collapsed public support, making his electoral record 1 for 4 and giving him the same number of electoral failures as Santorum, Newt and Perry combined (though those men chalked up more than two dozen wins between them).  
(I omit Paul because he is a libertarian who has tripped up at the polls as often as Mitt, as he surely will again, though he has won a hell of a lot more races.)
Mittsies will refuse to discuss Mitt’s Democratic background, his irritation that blacks were finally admitted into the Mormon church and his serial employment of illegal aliens to maintain his estate even after being caught red-handed by reporters and falsely promising he’d never allow it to happen again, consistent with his support of “sanctuary cities” where illegals are protected from repercussions of their lawbreaking.
Mittsies will remain mum in the face of Mitt’s pro-Clinton, anti-Reagan, anti-Contract for America history. To call attention to the matter incites them to attack his rivals instead of defending the Massachusetts Two Step.
During Coulter’s cheerleading for her adopted Democratic stepson in mysterious Mittsyville, Coulter’s tallies of recommendations from her primarily conservative audience plunged to 2 or 3 percent of the usual pace. It’s one thing to HAVE to vote for a hollow-gram; it’s another to develop or feign excitement over it.
One of the most authoritative sources for this reconstructed slick Willie (technically, Willard), remains the compilation offered by redstate.com, a Human Events contributor whose name can be found atop this page. 
See http://www.redstate.com/erick/files/2011/10/FLIPFLOPS.pdf

Better get a second opinion.

What are Ron Paul’s Hemorrhoids telling you? 

Just Unsubscribed. Tired of Ann’s Establishment rants about how great Romney is

Less red meat and more vegetables. Not sure what it means…

You’ll love her again when she moves her sights (can I still say that?) to Obama in a few months.

Keeps your system a lot more regular.

Agreed Andy, and remember New Hampshire is an open primary. More accurately, you can walk in register republican and vote. Democrats have no need to vote for Obama and will vote for the most liberal republican.

Sorry TY but the LEFT IS BLIND TO HYPOCRISY. 

Here is a list of the 25 richest (26 thanks to a tie) celebrities supporting the Occupy Movement (Source: Celebrity Net Worth)They definitely belong in the 99%?

1. Yoko Ono – $500 million 2. Jay-Z – $450 million 3. David Letterman – $400 million (tie) Stephen King – $400 million 5. Russell Simmons – $325 million 6. Sean Lennon – $200 million 7. Mike Myers – $175 million 8. George Clooney – $160 million. 9. Brad Pitt – $150 million (tie) Don King – $150 million 11. Roger Waters (Pink Floyd) – $145 million 12. Jane Fonda – $120 million (tie) Miley Cyrus – 120 million 14. Al Gore – $100 million 15. Roseanne Barr – $80 million (tie) Deepak Chopra – $80 million 17. Kanye West – $70 million (tie) Dan Rather – $70 million 19. Alec Baldwin – $65 million (tie) Matt Damon – $65 million 21. Tom Morello – $60 million (tie) Mia Farrow – $60 million 23. Katy Perry – $55 million 24. Michael Moore – $50 million (tie) Susan Sarandon $50 million (tie) Zack de la Rocha – $50 million 

LAST NIGHT TWO SMOKE BOMBS were hurled over the White House fence by the Occupy DC and this should be labeled a “terrorist attack” and the anarchist movement should be immediately investigated by Janet Napolitano’s Homeland Security since it could have easily been poisonous gas bombs.  This, like the shooting at the WH even when the President was not there, was considered an assassination attempt and so should this incident. Therefore, ANYONE, INCLUDING OBAMA, aiding and supporting a now “terrorist organization,” which the Democrats, and the above list, have proudly supported and funded, should now be arrested for “aiding and abetting a terrorist organization and their attempt to overthrow the United States!”

“Strongest Case”??  I wasn’t expecting anything more from her..but it’s obvious Ann isn’t going to touch on the numerous other problems(on ISSUES, even) Romney has.

Ann . . . . precisely correct!  

We’re at the point that absolutely nothing Progressives say and is echoed by the their minions in the msm can be believed is factual.   They have nothing to run on other than lies and perverting history to their image.

If we win Conservative control of the Senate and increase control of the House whomever is elected President will have to follow their lead.  The biggest problem will be nullifying all the crap that has been passed since the Socialist took control of our government.

The sound we’ll hear after the November election will be liberal heads imploding all over the USA!

I forgot to H/T delta river folk….for that list…

Yes, well said, Tony!  Ann’s midguided on this one, but then again she was keen on Chris Christie.  Her primary error here is this – it’s not what is WRONG with Mitt that is the issue, he is “okay!”  He’s just NOT THE BEST option, and none of them are perfect!  Difference between Mitt and Newt/Santorum – 15%, difference between any of the these three and BHO – 95%.

The Republican candidates should stop trying to destroy each other and start trying to destroy Obamma instead and let us know what they will do to reverse all of Obamma’s destructive policies that he has harmed this great country with.

That’s the candidate that the Republican establishment likes.  Milquetoast moderates have dominated the GOP ever since Reagan left office.  Republican voters keep voting for these guys so we only have ourselves to blame.  I will say that Romney is better than John McCain though.  If he actually intends to do what he says regarding immigration, I won’t have a lot to complain about.  Though I won’t hold my breath. 

Conservatives Remain the Largest Ideological Group in U.S.

http://www.gallup.com

Political ideology in the U.S. held steady in 2011, with 40% of Americans continuing to describe their views as conservative, 35% as moderate, and 21% as liberal. This marks the third straight year that conservatives have outnumbered moderates, after more than a decade in which moderates mainly tied or outnumbered conservatives.

The percentage of Americans calling themselves “moderate” has gradually diminished in the U.S. since it was 43% in 1992. That is the year Gallup started routinely measuring ideology with the current question. It fell to 39% in 2002 and has been 35% since 2010. At the same time, the country became more politically polarized, with the percentages of Americans calling themselves either “conservative” or “liberal” each increasing.

Gallup measures political ideology by asking Americans to say whether their political views are very conservative, conservative, moderate, liberal, or very liberal. Relatively few Americans identify with either extreme on this scale, although 2 in 10 Republicans self-identify as very conservative — double the proportion of Democrats calling themselves very liberal.

The 2011 results are based on 20 Gallup and USA Today/Gallup surveys conducted between January and December, encompassing interviews with 20,392 U.S. adults, including 5,912 Republicans, 6,087 Democrats, and 8,064 independents. The trends represent annual averages of multiday Gallup surveys conducted each year.

Conservatives Dominant Among Republicans

The majority of Republicans say they are either very conservative or conservative, but the total proportion of conservatives grew 10 percentage points between 2002 and 2010, from 62% to 72%. At the same time, the percentage of moderates fell from 31% to 23%. Relatively few Republicans say they are liberal — just 4% in 2011. Republicans’ ideology largely held at the 2010 levels in 2011.

Democrats Maintain Moderate-Liberal Divide

As recently as 2002, the solid plurality of Democrats were “moderate,” while smaller, but nearly equal, percentages called themselves “liberal” and “conservative.” From 2003 through 2007, the liberal share of the party grew to 38%, while the “moderate” and “conservative” percentages each diminished somewhat.

As a result, from 2007 through 2011, the party has consisted of equal percentages of moderates and liberals, at about 38% to 40%, while about 20% have called themselves conservative.

Independents Mostly Moderate, but Also More Conservative Than Liberal

Independents — who make up the largest political group in the country — have been steadier ideologically than either major party group over the last decade. However, since 2008, the proportion describing themselves as moderate has declined slightly, from 46% to 41%, and the proportion who are conservative has increased slightly, from 30% to 35%.

Currently, the largest segment of independents describe their views as moderate, while significantly more identify as conservative than as liberal, 35% vs. 20%.

Young Americans Are More Moderate; Older Americans, More Conservative

The ideological profile of adults aged 18 to 29 is markedly different from that of Americans in all older age groups. The plurality of young adults, 40%, are moderate, while equal percentages — 28% — are conservative or liberal. By contrast, the plurality of all older age groups, 40% or more, are conservative, while about a third are moderate and no more than 21% liberal.

Notably, the upward trend in conservatism among all Americans since 2002 is seen primarily among adults 30 and older. While those 18 to 29 grew more conservative for a brief period from 2002 through 2005, the percentage conservative subsequently reverted to fewer than 3 in 10, while conservatism continued to edge higher among older Americans.

Given that the adults aged 18 to 29 in 2000 make up the majority of 30- to 49-year-olds in 2011, it appears that conservative views take hold as Americans age, which may also explain the even higher rates of conservatism among 50- to 64-year-olds and seniors. However, in addition to these age patterns, it appears that conservatism has increased overall since 2002 because of heightened conservatism among all age groups of Americans 30 and older.

The percentage “liberal” rose slightly among all age groups over the past decade, although spikes in liberalism among certain groups in 2007 and 2008 did not last.

Bottom Line

Sizable segments of Americans identify with each of the three major ideological groups on the U.S. political spectrum; however, in recent years, conservatives have become the single largest group, consistently outnumbering moderates since 2009 and outnumbering liberals by 2-to-1.

Overall, the nation has grown more ideologically polarized over the past decade, with the percentage of moderates declining from 40% to 35% and the percentages of conservatives and liberals each rising. The increase in the proportion of conservatives is entirely the result of increased conservatism among Republicans and independents, and is also seen in Americans 30 and older — particularly seniors. The increase in the proportion of liberals is seen exclusively among Democrats as well as in all age groups.

At the same time these shifts have occurred, Americans’ party affiliation has tended to skew more Democratic than Republican, although in 2010 and 2011, the parties were about equal when the leanings of independents are taken into account.

You seem to fit somewhere in between. 

Web Worm

Another fringe nut for old beady eye the freedom for pot smokers candidate and friends of Islam voters.

Dear Ann Coulter,
The Wuss factor has eluded your thinking once more.
Willard would be the closest to, Gore

Jas,

Webworn fits somewhere between a braying Jackass and a shivering Gerbil.

Romney doesn’t have to explain his business decisions to “career politicians”.He has to explain them to the average Joe and Jane middle class voters.And if they perceive him to be disconnected with their plight, it will not be because they do not believe in the efficacy of capitalism.It will be because he is so willing to cavalierly bet $10,000 during a debate, because he seems to think earning $350,000 in speaker fees is chump change,admits to paying the equivalent tax rate of 15%,and has millions parked in off-shore Cayman Island  accounts. Seem to remember another failed Republican candidate who had no idea what a grocery store checkout scanner was  and it cost him the Presidency.And isn’t George Herbert Walker Bush one of Mitt’s heroes?Nobody has to attack capitalism to discredit Romney,he is rapidly developing the perception that he is an arrogant super rich elitist whose actions and utterances show no connection with the people whose votes he desperately needs to beat Obama!

Here’s my answer; destroy Romney first. If we can’t, do not vote for him in the general election. Vote for somebody even an independent that shares your views. Do not throw your vote away to get a white progressive rather than an almost black one. They are one and the same.   Check out the Constitution party. Wait for “the Don” to announce, anything, but do not support Romney.

Ann, you’re welcome to all the free speech in the world, but you’ve sold out.

The 100,000 job number is pure bull.  Most of what Romney claims comes from Staples from which he claims it’s total employment today of over 90,000.  Less than 40,000 of Staples employment occured before he left Bain in 1999 and his direct involvement in Staples had ended several years earlier.  He is claiming credit for other peoples leadership.
Elkins

Does Obamacare cover backbone implants for Republicans??

But they’ve been the Dead since the 1960s, and that never stopped them from making music.

Ron Paul may have good ideas, in fact, great ideas…but he is not electable.  Save your energy for someone who is.  Sometimes you just have to take the lessor of the evils.
If you put your energy and money into Ron Paul, your doing nothing more than what Ross Perot did to put Clinton in the WH….and we sure don’t need that to happen again.

She’s just supporting the candidate she believes has the best chance to beat Obama.  It’s sad that yet again the GOP is going to nominate another milquetoast flip flopping moderate but the field is pretty weak.  The only principled candidate is an enemy of the GOP leadership and has had to deal with being labeled a lunatic racist Nazi homophobe isolationist Israel hating demon worshiping maniac by the left and right.  It also doesn’t help that good looks and suave speaking abilities are a requirement for president in this day and age. 

He talks a good game but he record would suggest the opposite. 

Is Romney hitting this thing or what? Ann Coulter acts like Romney is Gods’ gift. She writes in her book that Gingrich is one of the greatest conservatives ever, but now the guy that can’t beat McCain is her idol. WOW So much for conservatism. I’ll never look at Ann Coulter with the same respect I used to have for her.

Jerryboob,

Ron Paul is living in 1936 and you are as well.  Dope for all will not help either. .

McCain’s voting record was more conservative than liberal, and he had credits as being pro-military, anti-pork and so on. When running for prez, however, he sucked up to the press.

The entire body of evidence of Mitt’s beliefs until about 6 years ago was dyed-in-the-wool liberalism. He was a proud, self-proclaimed progressive — that is, activist liberal. He ran to the left of Teddy Kennedy. He voted Dem and contributed to Dems. He governed as a leflty. He bought every leftist travesty of logic and fact there was.

The only thing we know of that’s changed is his rhetoric, and that’s by necessity.

Hay Patriot! No disagreement there. I also think that Ron Paul would be as destructive as Nagasaki. They must be two little boys, no fat man there! lol!!!

If you’re jealous, take it up with your boyfriend. 

Ok, lets say your right. Can Newt make any claim at all on jobs?

Ron Paul is nuttier then a bag of shelled peanuts. He has no chance to get the nomination.

I can see where his wife’s plastic head connects to her plastic shoulders.

It’s scary that he’s doing better than last time.

Yeah, it’s a shame but every election cycle the GOP puts up pathetic excuses for conservatives.  There hasn’t been a conservative nominee since Reagan.  GHW Bush, Bob Dole, GW Bush, John McCain, and now Romney.  All big government statists.  I suppose we only have ourselves to blame and our so-called conservative media that peddles these charlatans. 

And Daffy Duck will vote for Obama 43 million times in 57 different states!!

Still not enough.  He’ll need your vote too, Goofey! 

Given your post, one would come to the conclusion that you are either Jewish or a Christian; in either case — not the best way to end your post, especially since many here are Christian and can agree with a number of the points you made –Especially America’s establishment and greatness being a direct result of God’s will and blessings.

 I understand your anger — if America was truly a Christian nation; then America would look much different than it does today. But instead of calling others obscene names; try sharing God’s Word with them, and offer prayer for this country and its people. I guarantee you will have better results. Peace be with you.

Jezz. Second comment from you that’s senseless. 

Don’t hold your breath.  It’s all talk at the moment.  Romney’s the establishment candidate.  The business lobby and GOP establishment like legal and illegal immigration because it’s ‘good for business’.  Translation; It’s good for flooding the labor supply and driving down American wages. 

and all this is exactly what the current regime is doing, told us that is what he would do in advance, and plans to continue to do further if elected again in 2012…. God help America — pray that every opportunity — God help America — we cannot survive another 4 years of this idiocy

I am not settled on any candidate yet — but will vote for GOP  — it really comes down to saving this nation and republic — ANYONE BUT OBAMA — please keep that in mind and vote your conscience in the primaries.  After that — the goal has to be to save our nation, our freedom, our safety and security and our future — this will all be gone when Barry Obama does not have to worry about re-election.

I am supprised Ann can’t see who has the backbone to take on Obama, Newt has it all over Mitt, and his abismal record with Romney care, which he says he will repeal on national level with Obama Care.    But even he is far far better than idiot in white house now.  Also, time for Congress to get balls and backbone too, and idiots who blame them because they don’t let Obama get his way, which is only way he knows, are missing their grey matter or brains.  But some people will beleive the crap put out by Demo party.  I pity them, for then I will sell them a bridge in Arizona!!!!

A politician who seemingly has conned a lot of people into thinking he is a conservative when what we need is an Alan West or Marco Rubio to lead this country. Not another guy who can “get things done” in Washington by compromising with democrats like Specter or Snow did for years in the senate.

Back again mr. hall monitor?

They don’t understand theirselves that’s why they are all in therepy…

Grandma Barbie. Comes with corvette and halter top.

You’re from California Jack, you know who I mean.

LOL.  Jerry is the ‘Grateful’ part of the Grateful Dead so it isn’t quite the same.  I guess she could see ‘Further’ which is Bob Weir, Phil Lesh, and a Jerry Garcia impersonator from Dark Star Orchestra.  His guitar work is spot on as far as sounding like Jerry. 

Nobody is going to deport millions of illegals. However, with sensible government policy, there would be no need to deport anyone. If we take away all of the reasons for being in this country illegally, no jobs, no welfare, no free educations, no free medical care, n o automatic citizenship for kids born to two illegal parents, etc., they would simply go home on their own because they would have no reason for staying. 

Your right. Newt is his own worst enemy

Agreed, but as each one moved to the top the others would drag him/her back down like a drowning victim.

Well said Tony. Personally I think those two would make a formidable ticket-together. They could not be stopped. Being from the Northeast I am naturally suspicious of any politician from here that claims to be a Conservative. Most of them would not know what Conservative principles were if Christ himself came down and gave lessons. Romney is cut from this same ideologically neutral cloth. Unfortunately, while I had the impression he was a moderate ( whatever that might entail), after reading the 200 page report of McCain´ś opposition research from 2007 ( admittedly I read the highlights) it is worse than I feared. He really is Obama-lite. Ron Paul is nuttier than the proverbial fruitcake and Perry has no traction. I do not know what makes An attracted to moderate to liberal types. It is a disappointment.

Ann,
I usually agree with you & enjoy being challenged by your thoughts, but you are WRONG with this. There are 3 points right off the top of my head:
1. Although I agree that Mitt has done “well” in the business world, he would NOT have done so well w/o Poppa’s money & name;He lied & hid things to make many of his deals; He used foreign money to bloat then destroy certain companies, forcing them into Bankruptcy or moving to Mexico; other points that show he is not trustworthy;  
2. He is not trustworthy as a politician/leader. He has flipflopped so much on just about any issue just to get elected for a 4 year governorship then get thrown away by any other electorate. H e will say & do ANYTHING to get elected;
3. He’s a Northeasterner RINO. Proof? He’s form Mass & was elected gov of Mass. He “won” NH. We do NOT need another RINO – We need a solid leader who at least knows what “conservative” means. Remember? He threw us Tea Partiers & Conservatives under the BUS way back at the beginning of all this.

Romney is NOT the guy we need in the White House. Period.

As in being conservative. The guy was a progressive 10 years ago.

Gingrich talks a good load of crap and when it get to the bottom line…it IS crap.
Ann has figured this out…..and in talking about each numbnutz that thinks he’s got what it takes  she’s letting you sewe the up and the down sides…you’re only seeing and hearing what you want from her discourse.

Well said, Tony. 

If people would actually read what Ron Paul has written, rather than listening to media sound bites, they’d understand and appreciate his foreign policy.  He is not the nut case the media portrays him to be.  Five years ago I too thought Paul was goofed on skunk weed.  Since that time I have read a couple of his books and several of his articles.  He is committed to upholding the Constitution and opposed to central planning and big government.  Paul is the closest candidate to Ronald Reagan.  Unfortunately, I do not believe he has much chance of winning the vote.  If that is the case, I’ll vote for whomever wins the Republican nomination.  None of them are as worthless or dangerous as Obama.

An answer to each of your points.
1) The Freedoms of the Constitution to Overthrow the Constitution.
2) “America’s enemies” were Obama’s comrades, Soviet Union, while in college.
3) Israel is always their enemy.
4) Weaken defenses so Obama’s Communist friends can then takeover.
5) Defeat America using the Almighty Dollar.
6) Communists hate free markets.
7) Their goal is a “Brother against Brother” Civil War.
8) Dependent on Oil dictators and people that hate us.
9) “Hussein Obama” and his apology tours/spitting on us!

If you are under the impression that I am a Romney supporter, read again. I’m good with Ron Paul’s constitutionalism, but his world view is beyond nutty. His dislike of the military is far left of Obama.

He’s not?

Why then does his personal investment portfolio have a Doomsday patina to it? 

Give him an old backyard bunker left over from the Cold War, subterranean pot garden, and a copy of Jimmy Carter’s “Peace Through Weakness” (due out any day), and old Ron’s ready to face Armageddon.  LOL!!!

No Can Do!

They’re the last buyer of Treasury Bonds. 

I agree that Newt is by far the worst candidate with the most baggage.  Obama would relish the chance to have him as the GOP nominee.  The guy has proposed the most maniacal big government progressive solutions throughout his career.  Somehow a chunk of conservatives are falling for his conservative red meat schtick.  I thought elephants were supposed to have great memories.  That being said, Romney’s got some progressive skeletons in his own closet.  He talks a good game and has the chiseled looks that make him electable but I don’t have a lot of confidence that he would govern as a conservative when given the opportunity. 

I don’t pretend to be friendly to Mittsies. With rare exception, they behave in a fashion that parallels Obamatons. I laid that out in one of the first dozen or so posts on this thread.

Virtually any Republican who entered the race, with the possible exception of Paul, would be a better choice than Mitt, and Paul at least can be credited with 100 times more sincerity than Mr. Massachusetts.

Mitt’s record is so fraudulent that Dems will dine on him all the way through the election. He’s gone one for four, having been shorn as many times as his Republican rivals combined (I classify Paul as a libertarian hanging onto the back bumper of the Republican SUV).

I will hold my nose, as I’ve said here many a time, and pull the level that says Willard if he he slips his collar on the nomination.

But if that happens, it will probably be pointless, because a good chunk of libertarians, evangelicals, tea partiers and hard-line conservatives will fall in line behind an independent like Trump and split the Republican vote.

That likely won’t happen with another GOP nominee, but Mitt is so loathed that he’ll sink the entire ship.

So you read “the Ballad of Dale Hog” too.  LOL!!!

limark,  romney is saying all of the conservative idea’s
   you people keep looking at his past in a liberal state,
   none of the others can beat obama,, and the shhit has
  got to go, and romney is the only one that can beat him,
   im not gonna vote for a candidate that is going around
   saying that he will give amnesty to illegals.  are you
  a conservative,, by god i’am.

Rahmney’s rivals are heavily flawed. Mitt himself is a total mirage with no history whatsoever suggesting any substance other than being a well-heeled Learjet lib and a long-time office seeker who has lucked on one win in 18 years.

I don’t think Trump will run.  He just likes the media exposure.  Besides, he is not historically conservative.  I like his views on tariffs and foreign policy.  His foreign policy is the ‘F U we’re gonna take your oil’ version of Ron Paul’s. 

Well said. I was listening to Jim DeMint the other day. He said it didn’t matter so much if the candidate, hinting at Mitt Romney, is as conservative as most of us would like, the important thing is to defeat Obama. DeMint said that if a conservative Senate and Congress presents any Republican President a Bill, they will sign it. The important thing is to get a Republican elected. In politics if you’re not first, your last. At this point we’re not picking a President, we’re picking a Candidate who can win. I think that man is Romney.

NEVER EVER VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Jezzzzzzzzzzz..

He fought with the dem’s over this. Then settled on the plan of lettings these people in with border enforcement.
The bill passed the dems never funded the border.

Offer proof, not your opinion

So was Reagan.   Anything else you wish to bring up

I know my constitution and my history. Will we react to terrorism in the way of John Adams, or Thomas Jefferson. I submit that Ron Paul and gene1357 would react in the way of John Adams. Proven to fail.

Yeah, but also (to use an old Rahmney term) the brainwashed body of Republicans. 

There were a number of conservatives with long, strong conservative credentials 4 years ago from both chambers of Congress and governor’s seats, and all slid off the elephant’s greasy back.

I don’t think it’s the conservative media that peddle the RINOs so much as grass roots GOP distaste for a course of action that would require sacrifice and discipline.

I agree. I’m going to vote for GOP nominee no matter who it is for the sole reason of the Supreme Court nominees. We are one justice away from making the 2nd amendment a collective state militia right by the ‘living document’ leftists on the SCOTUS.

Not at all…Paul is like the crazy uncle at the dinner table…do you really think these people will stop hating us and stop trying to destroy us if what….we just mind our own business …if you do your a fool of the highest order…

AAAAAAAAAI-I-I-IIIIEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEK! Romney is in the title again.

Ron Paul’s way of thinking went out with the covered wagon. 

Everything’s end this or end that.

End the Fed, War on Drugs, Military Adventurism…..

Can’t he just End His Campaign?

Romney really pooched it at the debate the other day.  The attacks on him relating to his purported ‘vulture capitalism’ are misplaced (as amply demonstrated by Ann above), but somewhat effective to the uninitiated.  Unfortunately for Mitt, his apparent inability to dynamically answer that particular rhetoric is even more damaging.  This should be a no-brainer for him, yet he still seems unable to give a good retort.  And a good retort should satisfy the uninitiated and make the savvy grin at how it will tear apart Obama when he tries to play that particular card.

In the meantime, Sarah Palin has given Newt a defacto endorsement (saying on Hannity that if she were a SC voter, she’d be voting for Newt… and that over the next few weeks she thinks it would be a good thing if the other ‘non-Mitts’ dropped out and fell in in support of Gingrich).  Mark Levin says he would currently support Santorum IF he was voting, but has also repeatedly and pointedly criticised Mitt while challenging criticism of Newt…. in other words, if Santorum drops out, look for Levin to support Newt.  Thomas Sowell has said in essence that Newt is the only Republican candidate running that has a chance of turning back our drift to the left and of saving the economy along with our culture.

Ann, of course, would like to see Newt drawn and quartered and his varius parts scattered to the four winds and buried in unmarked graves.  Of conservative pundits, she stands alone espousing a level of vitriol against Gingrich sufficient to curl hair within a two mile radius.

So far Romney (who many say already has it all locked up) has but 12 delegates of the 1245 he’ll need for the nomination……. so I’m guessing it’s not quite over yet….especially with Palin going deeper and deeper into Newt’s corner each day.

Newt’s (admittedly) unjustified attacks on Romney’s business history appears to have had its desired effect.  Romney has been stung, and seems to be backing off his unjustified attacks on Newt.  At least he is playing the magnanimous one as long as his poll numbers are ahead of Newts.  His problem is that the items he brings up on Newt have been damaging mostly to Newt’s appeal to his conservative base….. and once vetted will become old news and irrelevant to conservatives in the long run.  The BS rantings that Newt has been firing back with, will kill Mitt’s appeal to to populist voters and independents, and will be bolstered by the Democrats once they get fully involved.

In other words, Newt’s attacks on Mitt will likely hurt him more in the long run than Mitt’s attacks on Newt.

For me, the choice was made a while ago.  Mitt gets my full support if he’s the only one left standing…. but I’m doing what I can to see to it that he isn’t.

Go figger …..lol…

Newt didn’t need two things:

1)  A wife with no moveable parts.

2)  Sarah Palin’s kiss of death.

I’d like to see her in a tank top–even a Jerry Garcia colored tank top. 

Mitt’s inability to adequately reply to the ‘vulture capitalism’ charges are becoming noticeable.  It should not be that hard.  Just saying capitalism is a risky business with both winners and losers isn’t getting it. 

I can’t help but think that if Newt was the recipient of that particular brand of criticism under the same circumstances as Mitt is ‘enjoying’, he’d knock it out of the park so hard that Obama would be afraid to bring the issue up in the future.

My god! This arrogent man has changed positions on every issue! Mitt The Ripper! Ann is a transexual or has end stage aids! What a sick looking, dummy of a broad..Obama!

How may I ask is Romney being pushed down anyone’s throat? If Romney is the nominee it will be because he got the most votes. Anyone of the Republican candidates would be better then obama. In the case of Ron Paul, not very much but at least his goal would not be to destroy the free enterprise system, obama’s is.

I believe there are only two candidates running that can beat obama in a heads-up “debate.” Romney and Gingrich, and Romney is questionable. Now if it were just personalties it would likely be Perry and Santorum. Both are extremely likable personalities. Or just issues I guess it could be Paul (except for forign affairs) or Gingrich with a possibility of Romney. However, if obama has proven anything during the last three years it is that he is a master of BS. He also knows all the angles to lie and cheat so it will take someone experienced in government that knows all the ins and outs. Furthermore, to overcome his (obama’s) talking points and fabrications it will take considerable experience, determination and intuition. Who ever the nominee is they must prepare for the obama spin as to the events over the last three years. Their preparation must include prepping for the obama view point. Just being logical is not enough.

There is however, no doubt the two most experienced in getting things done and getting the other party to cooperate is both Gingrich and Romney.

Because this is such an important election, perhaps the survival of this nation depends on a conservative winning. We, as a nation, need to take it just as serious as it really is. We need to get over the self-righteousness and selfishness and be determined to support whoever the nominee turns out to be. Even if the nominee is not our personal choice.

It is very easy to set back and say “my dog could beat obama.” But don’t believe it, that’s not true. No one, and I mean no one will run over him in an election. This is going to be Chicago politics at its best. If you know what I mean. How could anyone expect such a corrupt person to run a legitimate campaign. So we had better quit arguing and start working together or we will cause our own demise! I once heard it said “it ain’t the voter that counts, it the counter of the votes that counts.”

If Ron Paul (who is admittedly not a conservative) is the nominee I will support him out of desperation because the objective must be to defeat obama in 2012. Although, I have a tendency to not believe in the end of the world on December 21, 2012, it should be quite obvious to everyone who “does not vote for a living” if obama is reelected he will destroy this nation beyond recognition. Consequently, that predicted catastrophe may be obama’s reelection.

Here, here!  Make Paul Secretary of the Treasury, and turn him loose on Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and the Fed.  But for God’s sake don’t let him anywhere near anything with ‘foreign’ in it’s title.

Very clever changing of my name.  That is hilarious.

I thought to be a conservative was to ‘conserve’ traditions of American culture.  I would say Paul actually lives in 1789 because he wishes to uphold and defend the Constitution. 

excuses,excuses. If I had apenny for everytime you RomneyBots made an excuse for him I’d be a filthy rich as him.
Do you people have any standards at all? A candidates history should speak volumes to all of us, yet it seems to the Romneybots, we the people need to just forget that stuff.
No Thanks, I prefer to hold the POTUS accountable for what he says and does.

Mitt on Obamacare: Don’t repeal it; save the “good” parts and smite the “bad” parts.

Don’t know if he’s changed his public posture on that now (he usually does), but if he has, it doesn’t mean he believes differently.

Jihad: let’s save the good parts and strike down the bad parts.

Hey Paul Snow:  Ur below comment on R. Paul.
“But we do know what the good Doctor from Texas will do, because he has been calling it right for 30 years”.
I AGREE with U but this time 2012, he should continue calling it from a Rocking Chair & Smoking More Marihuna… Only this time, it will be LEGAL if he was to get his Wish.  & whether you like it or Not, R.Paul is a NUTCASE.

My assessment of Paul as a wing nut on foreign policy has nothing to do with media sound bites.  It’s based on his responses, from his own mouth, in debates and interviews where he has been given ample opportunity to explain his views at great length.  I have no misconceptions based on other peoples’ editing.  He is condemned as a goofball by his own words, not others’.

There you be.

As for Mitt deporting anyone, he was a best friend of sanctuary cities, which flowered in Massachusetts. In fact, as governor, he repeatedly hired illegals to maintain his estate, proving how advantageous it would be to have a president with business experience.

He’d probably turn the entire US into an extended sanctuary city.  Then, illegals would be no problem.

Thanx, Deeme.  I’ve been looking for that poem since mid 2008 !

FYI (if you didn’t already know)  Silent Cal was Reagan’s favorite 20th Century president.

Obama fits the bill. Ron Paul only fits 2,3,4 and 7.

That’s where logic comes in.

If she disguises her motivations, then you can bet they’re not honorable.

I’m going to have to reprogram them — I don’t know what went wrong?

It’s called politics.

It’s something that had been contained in a Pandora’s box.

In Iowa, Mitt opened the box.

This talking point against Paul is very weak.  Paul has explained why he appropriates the pork.  It brings back tax money to his district which otherwise would be spent recklessly by the Feds.  This brings a little transparency to an otherwise corrupt system.  He is supposed to represent his constituents that elect him.  Bringing back some of the federal tax money to his constituents is really grasping at straws to find something to attack him with. 

I don’t think what went wrong was you..lol…

I knew I should have used metal when creating their genitals; but I ran out and had to use tennis balls. Dang it!

LOL!

I didn’t realize they had any balls.

I am a former employee of AMPAD and I know that business decisions are made that adversely affect some employees and help others.  That is life.  In fact, all of life has good and bad impact on people.  I am not sold on any of the candidates but suggest that no one make their decisions based on one or two events in the past of any of them.  Ron Paul is a great example of evaluating people as they are today – he has become a nutcase.  Remember to look at who these people are now, not just who they were.  And remember – any one of them will be better than more Obama socialism!

The real problem of a divorced politician isn’t that he has committed divorce. It’s that he has an ex-wife.

Ron Paul has some good points on many things…but our country is not going to be protected by Ron Paul’s foreign policy stance.  You might as well have him riding Obama’s unicorns….and the rest of us making daisy chain necklaces to wear while singing Kumbaya.  Get real –

One disagreement. I haven’t seen evidence that he engaged in any misrepresentation to be elected governor. He was being himself.

When he decided to run for prez in 2006 he reversed almost every stand he had taken before.

The founding fathers figured it out by the third presidency. Some still have trouble with it.

You clearly see that Romney’s record at Bain Capital was much better and far different than that painted by the media and the political attack ads.  Yet Mr. Romney himself seems to have a very difficult time explaining why he was successful at turnarounds and why the outcome was very much more productive than he is given credit for.  If he has such a hard time defending a very good record as a company savior and job creator, how will he do in a debate with President Obama or weather the hundreds of millions of political attack ads that the President has even now already begun in several markets?

If they fall for this temptation?

Too late.

Envy was the first sin ever, and ever since — it continues to spread like a cancer throughout many peoples lives — most lack the introspection to even realize it exists within them.

Romney did the same thing in 2008. Coincidence? No evidence whatsoever for that. 

What I discovered after about 3 weeks of Coulter pro-Mitt jihad is that the vast bulk of devoted Mittsies not only tolerate such misbehavior but engage in the same thing. 

It’s the Mark of the Left.

Nice…the clarity of your thought is refreshing…and one of the only things that can save this country is thinkers such as yourself…

Bravo for reading the article. As soon as I realized the broken record continued, I scrolled on down  to the comments instead of reading.

Goat slanderer!

I think that’s what I just said.

My problem with Ron Paul is that he didn’t study the founding fathers after they won. He really needs to aquaint himself with the presidencies of John Adams and Thomas Jefferson. They learned a lot that Ron Paul seems to be missing.

LMAO

At least he is our lovable dirt bag.

USA is wekll on the way to becoming as socialist as Canada, unless voters who understand this get behind a conservative with all the legs on his stool. A genuine Constitutional, Economic and Social conservative can pull all conservatives out to vote. One leg missing and we’ll have a rerun of 2008. Leftists will always seek to divide and conquer. Don’t fall for that old story again. If Mitt is a good businessman and understands the economy, chalk one up for him. If he converts to protection of life from conception to natural death, chalk one up for him. One leg remains, how is he at defending the constitution? As good or better than the rest? Then what are you all talking about? Do you believe he’ll bring the Federal Reserve to heel, Ron Paul’s pet project, or is that even possible? I believe Mitt can do the job once he’s in, but whipping Obamanation at the polls won’t be easy. BHO’s system will count every gravestone twice. Lotsa luck.

I kinda like that dirt bag.

A venture capitalist doesn’t become the CEO welkins.  He lends money and guides the current leadership of the companies.   

Dear Ann, 
 
Your conservative credentials are sinking with the USS Romney.   Please spare us another lecture from RINOLAND, please.

Good for you Michael.  I agree

Yes, I agree. You are always a repository of facts that many of us cannot dispute, and sadly, many do not understand. But keep it coming. They will eventually understand.

I have to say that this election I have really investigated as much as I can all the candidates and if I was voting with my personal feelings I would have to go with Ron Paul.

If I am voting for the man who can help the economy most, I would have to say Mitt is the choice and if I am going to go with the established republican line then Newt is my man,

I am from PA and for no particular reason I just do not like Santorum. I probably should but I just don’t. Whats unfortunate, in all my years voting I only left the republican party once and voted for the democrat running for president. It was a big mistake.However, in my personal situation though I made more money, both in my business and in the market when Clinton was in office then i did at any other point in time. So for me this year, I am personally hoping Romney gets the nomination, but if he doesn’t I would most likely choose whomever does get the nomination. Heck I am pretty sure I would choose Satan over Obama.

You know what Ann? Since when does “20 years in private enterprise” qualify to be President? Not saying it doesn’t , but thats all that you seem to spout. whoopdy doo.

The Country is rotting. I do not have any faith in anyone who is supposedly “running” things. That includes people like you.

I’m 40 years old. I have 2 young children. They will not have the same opportunities that I did. That is the saddest part of this whole disaster. I have the rest of my life to make sure that they do.

Every man/woman/child for themself. That’s the mantra going forward. Good luck with yourself.

I’m assuming you’re referring to foreign policy?

Paul’s not perfect. No candidate is. I wish he would take a little more hawkish stance when it comes to our enemies but I just don’t get the foaming at the mouth war propaganda that the GOP currently stands for. The whole notion that we need to be fighting wars in countries half way around the world, build up their nations, and establish democracies in order to ‘keep America safe’ falls flat on its face when you look to our lawless crime-ridden southern border.

Paul’s domestic policies are sorely needed to help restore America to its former glory. In my opinion, that outweighs the foreign policy of policing the world. With the current band of flip flopping candidates who lack principles, I feel Paul is the only one whom I can trust to carry out what he campaigns on.

LADY ANNANN is at it again, for a man today, that is an empty suit.

Do you think that “THE DONALD” would apologize for being a BILLIONAIRE. And when asked by some “pencil stick marxist”, what is your bracket for paying taxes? He certainly would not dodge it. As for Romney, in a soft voice, he announces that he is in the 15% bracket, meaning that he acquires his income from dividends, which is legal, and I applaud any person that gets it, but he sounds like a thief running in the night.

But, he is so scare of the POOR PEOPLE thinking that they are paying a higher tax bracket, and he will be hated by the “little people”. He is not a leader, period. He was simply there at the right time that took advantage of the laws in making money by pooling wealthy/investments, and seeking and taking advantage of opportunities, but the reason I bring this up, is that he is not really proud of what he did.

He will be painted fully as that modern day ROBBER BARON, and will lose the election. Without appealing with and to the blue collar masses, he will certainly lose.

The house and senate seats will not improve if so. And all because we have a corrupted democracy. UNLESS……………………………………

Newt’s about to find out what a bad ex is all about. 

Libnot, Romney’s business experience is just one of his attributes.  His education, political life, community building as in the Olympics – all good.
His family is solid.  I think he’d make a great president. 
I fear for my grand kids but if we don’t get someone like Romney there it will be worse.

Is that why their balls are up in the air!  They just keep juggling them.

Well it gave us something to do in the evenings and for that many wives, girlfriends, and strippers are either very happy or pissed off. But what are ya gonna do?

So if she supports Romney and thinks he would be good, she is a shill?

“A virtuous people are nearly impossible to enslave by a ruling class.”

Being truly virtuous is a challenge for even the best of Christians; given the state of the Church and Christianity in America today — isn’t it apparent that many are already enslaved.

Tancredo?  Thompson?

Surely you jest.

While I like the Constitutional arguments for Paul, he simply doesn’t understand that there is real evil in the world that wants to kill western civilization.

Education? Obama was the most “educated” President ever, wasn’t he? Political life? RomneyCare? enough said there. Community building? Isn’t the current CIC’s original job a “community organizer”? Family….sure, he has a nice one. So do I. Big whoop.

I have lost all respect for people like Ann Coulter, Glenn Beck, Charles Krauthammer, Chris Wallace; These people have purposely tried to influence this election by supporting and promoting candidates while claiming to be objective reporters(well all except Coulter and Beck) But fuck them too.

Willard Mitt Romney - Massachusetts RHINO - Romney
Ronald Earnest Paul Good hearted – 70% correct 30% Crazy 76 PaulRichard John Santorum Conservative 54 Despised by the gay community. Santorum. Newton Leroy Gingrich Conservative 68 unpredictable bomb thrower, strong debater. GingrichJames Richard Perry Straight shooter - Lacks debate skills. 61 – Social conservative No such thing as a Lesbian just, women that have not met Rick.  Perry

It’s easier just to give her everything she wants up front and tell her it is all your fault, and you are the crazy one, not her.
Even then she will hate you for spending time with her and changing your mind. But that is a psycho’s prerogative.

Uh……………..can I empty your waste basket? Wan’t some coffee?

I am going to have to go for Newt.  I like Santorum, but his big spending past scares me.  Romney seems like a balanced and experienced individual, but please take a look at MassResistance, a group in Massachusetts that has had to try to clean up Mitt’s mess, after he was Governor and supported many things that certainly were not conservative!  He is weak with same-sex groups, and I believe gave money to gay pride parades.  Not sure about that but I know he has been no supporter of traditional marriage, so that would disappear under his presidency (traditional marriage I mean).  This is no small matter! 
Newt’s handling of race-baiting Juan Williams made my mind up.  Newt has such intelligence.  He may have an ego as some say, but so what?  I want a confident President who can verbally take these liberals and race-baiters on and tie them up in their own absurd accusations.  Nobody but Newt can do that.  The others get nervous, sweat, stutter, and bluster, but Newt just handles em.  It’s beautiful to watch, and I for one, want to see someone conservative and smart, just shut the mouths of these stinking liberals that we have had to endure, lo these many years.  Go NEWT!

I think you need to explain all this Spanky….. Mitt

-supported gun control
-supported abortion on demand
-supported Obama stimulus
-supports manmand global warming
-supported racial and gender quotas
-supported Obama’s timetables for withdrawal (giving the enemy our blueprint)
-supports a healthcare plan in Mass thats bankrupting the State
-Publically said in 2002 that he was a moderate.
-Publically said that he didn’t support Reagan.
-Supported Paul Tsongus for President.

Thanks only to his oratory superiority, the Newt Gingrich Bi-Polar Express has a fresh head of steam.
 
But sadly, one must look back no further than last week — where Gingrich breathed new life into Obama’s dying Occupy movement with this pandering statement: “how come I lost my mortgage and you stayed a millionaire” — to understand that bombastic lines, no matter how brilliant or moving, no more define the character of the man than soaring rhetoric has ever provided one poor person a job.

Last week, Gingrich’s lithium count spiked into the “loony lib” zone when he redefined capitalism as: ”if you somehow buy something and you make sure you take all the money out of it and then you leave nothing behind for the people who originally made it exist, I think that is not a style of capitalism we want to favor”. (That scribbling noise is marxists everywhere adding Newt to their May Day card list.) http://www.foxnews.com/on-air/america-live/index.html#/v/1381399979001/gingrich-im-totally-committed-to-capitalism/?playlist_id=87651
 
Psychologically, Newt Gingrich probably has more in common with the easily distracted, recklessly narcissistic, grand standing Captain Francesco Schettino of the now shipwrecked Costa Concordia, than with a trusted world leader capable of staying responsibly and dependably on the agreed to course .
 
Everyone would that Newt’s inspirational words alone would erase the misery and reality of Newt’s life of character exposing failures, as much as we would that they could end Obama’s efforts to permanently enslave Americans to the nanny state.
 
In reality, unseating Obama from a White House surrounded twenty deep by the vapid rabidly liberal media, epitomized in Williams, will take more than sublime rhetoric, no matter how masterfully elucidated.
 
Soberingly, the line of the day that will carry the most effect on decision day, November 6, 2012, came from another old fat rich white guy; the avowed marxist Michael Moore told the New York Times the following:  “I wondered who they stole from my crew.  It was fun to hear what I have been saying for 20 years, not just by any Republican candidate, but Newt Gingrich.”

Gladly, I share no values or principles with Newt Gingrich, as mine actually exist.

Gingrich will lose the under 40s and women 3 to1.  Newt Gingrich has zero chance of beating Obama, zero.

A vote for Gingrich now is a vote for Obama in November.

Someone once said “Speak softly and carry a big stick”.
Well we have the big stick. But we have in our government a bunch of shrill, whiny crybabies that make it look like we will never use it until it is too late. And they whittle the stick down every chance they get.
I would like to see the hippie crowd protest before a war instead of after our troops are in harms way for once. That would show some intelligence.
The southern border definitely is something that needs to be zipped up once and for all!.

Good ex, Bad ex….everybody ought to have at least one of each!

LOL

Ahhh. even though I hate O-bumber care. it does have a few “good” ideas.

I live in the Seattle area.  (Everett) 

The national Chamber of Commerce is a well-known (even notorious) opponent of measures that would stem illegal immigration.

With the acknowledgement that God oversees everything, this is how I see life.

Numero Uno – That B me.

2.  That be my family.

3.  Friends and neighbors.

4.  The needy

5.  No one else is my problem.  So we won’t discuss 5.

If you want to understand ‘greed’ then read Walt Williams last two articles on the subject.

Freedom and liberty are about YOU.  That’s where it starts.  From there it is up to you to provide for and nurture your family, and so on down the line.  Putting 4, 3, and 2 before 1 means it won’t work.  You don’t really have liberty, you don’t have freedoms.

However, if you use your freedom and liberty to be the best you can be, first 2, and then 3 and finally 4 will do well also.

There is nothing wrong with someone going after everything they can get.

Americans today could not arrive at the constitution.  Our liberty is very much in jeopardy.   Europe would have lost it’s liberty twice by the mid 20th century had it not been for the U.S.  Many here look at European socialism and say it doesn’t have the consequences we speak of.  But Europeans have been living on borrowed time since 1945 having a benefactor that saved their liberty twice in the 20th century and repeatedly bailed them out even up this this past year with Greece and the Euro.  If Greece had not be propped up it would have already fallen to totalitarianism or civil war by now.  And the Euro might have already collapsed recently. We have lost control already and don’t know it.  We aren’t going to decide when we default.  Our creditors will decide that.  China is in a position to cause us to default at the strategic time of their choosing.  Europe is leaning on us and we are hock to a totalitarian state.  The situation is beyond pathetic.  And Americans aren’t willing even now to listen to the truth of the dire situation we’re in. They believe we can return to the way we were before Obama took office not realizing we have enter the end game of the FDR ponzi scheme and the progressive administrative state he laid the foundation of. Not even Reagan could save us now. All Reagan did was cut taxes and regulations which grew the economy which fed the beast allowing it to grow to its present size. If we do get one more kick of the can down the road with a revived economy but without drastically scaling back government it won’t work. Even if we cut government by 40% tomorrow all that would do is keep our debt from growing. It would even start paying it off. People can get new card credits to pay off their other credit cards for only so long. Their standard of living appears to improve in the near term. But it’s like taking uppers. Sooner or later you are going to crash. And that typically takes 3 1/2 generations for nations traveling down the route to reach the end game. We’re there now. And people think oh no we can go back to the way we were and everything is going to be okay. Wrong. We are past the point now where there is a pleasant route back.

Rolly Polly LOLY!!

Ron Paul is the only one who has enough brains to beat Obama.I agree we need to beat Obama,But Rick Santorum has no chance whatsoever. Neither does Newt Gingrich , although he would be better that Mitt Romney. Mitt is really a democrat socialist running as a conservative Republican. He can’t even answer any questions without checking to see what the polls say first.Then , he asks Ron Paul for the correct answer. Really , even Mitt Romney Knows Ron Paul is the only person that is a true constitutionalist ,realistic , truthful , has good character. These people ,calling him a lunatic are really Democrats who know that he would trounce Obama in any debate. He has an excellent record of unfailing ethics and has always voted in defense of the true Constitutional American way. No matter what he says he wants to do , we all know nobody can actually accomplish everything they want to , and he will rule according to the law , and the constitution. Not by “trying to be King”,but by working with his true constituents , pointing out the fallacies of his opponents,and using his veto powers , and executive orders in the manner intended by the Constitution.We know he isn’t liked by the Liberal Media , so that’s the first thing to say “he’s the one we need”. He doesn’t want to “outlaw birth control” , overthrow the supreme court , rewrite the constitution,like some other persons mentioned here. And the Military absolutely loves him , contrary to several lies.

Thank you for your vote for Obama.

LOL,   Here’s another reason to vote for Newt:
CAIR blasts Gingrich for limiting hires to Muslims who renounce Shariah lawThe largest Muslim lobbying group in the United States on Wednesday condemned Newt Gingrich
for saying he would only hire Muslims to his administration if they
renounced the use of Islam’s Shariah law as a tool for U.S. government.

Calling Gingrich “one of the nation’s worst
promoters of anti-Muslim bigotry,” the Council of American Islamic
Relations suggested the Republican presidential candidate is a
segregationist.

>>>If those lying , taqiyya spouting  gangsters don’t like him,  he’s the right man.

Stupid is as stupid does sir!

Hey Fellas!!!

I’m a Dimocrat!  LOL!!!

Sounds like you started a little early on Paul’s plan to legalize drugs. 

Mapmakers seemed to lose track of Fortress America somewhere around WW II. Dr. Paul claims to have found it, but can he carry that vision to our enemies?

Color me skeptical.

Is that what he said?

When I listened to that debate, he said

1. he was totally against them.
2. I vote for them for my district because not to do so would be letting down my constituents.
3. Everything should be earmarks.

And he hopped back and forth on that one for 2 minutes and had me totally confused by the end.

If money coming to the federal government needs to be returned to the states, why did it leave the states in the first place?

I didn’t think Kathleen deserved that response from you, and I take it you felt the same way about mine?

I have heard that same advice offered by Euell Gibbons. Hats: Many parts are edible….

Not at all. Say whatever you like.

I’m your Huckleberry. Say when?

Newton ought to wrap that up as a campaign endorsement.    A GOP nominee should kill for that kind of press

Thaaanks TDO! I needed that! Your timing is impeccable this evening sir! He can move the minds of kings wheresoever he will… ; )

Ann,

I am a fan of yours, and understand what you are saying here.  At the same time, I would like to submit that you need to extend your range of targets beyond the Left.  Leftists are useful idiots.  The salient question is “for whom, and in the service of what goal?”

Here is an interesting book, written by someone firmly within the “Establishment”, and approved by named sundry other members of the Establishment, in which he argues that the entire planet is, for all intents and purposes, run by 6,000 people (of which you are not one): http://www.amazon.com/Superclass-Global-Power-Elite-Making/dp/0374272107

As I look at Romney’s contributors, they are nearly identical at the top to those of Obama.  So-called “Wall Street”, for which we are supposed by many to insert the word “Capitalists” more generally, is of course vastly overrepresented.  These people do not expect to NOT get their moneys worthy.

Please grasp that our system is designed to transfer wealth BOTH to the Federal Government AND to unnamed power elites who are on the receiving end of Federal Reserve spending sprees, with the last worth some $600 billion, which is to say substantially more than the GDP of virtually every country on Earth.

Further, please consider that Romney is not even remotely serious on the budget.  Yes, we will get some small gifts such as the end of Obamacare, but we are ALREADY borrowing $120 billion a month, and his big idea is to cut $20 billion a YEAR from that.  That is five days worth of borrowing.

My case for Ron Paul–and I am no pie-eyed fanatic–I have made here: http://www.moderatesunited.blogspot.com/2012/01/open-letter-to-ron-paul-skeptics.html

In my view it is both clear and conclusive.  All serious conservatives should rally behind Paul, as he very clearly, empirically, CAN be elected against Obama.  As I see it, since nobody but the banks is happy enough about Romney to campaign for him and do all the things the unions will be doing for Obama, I think he is actually the MOST electable candidate.

We aren’t looking to date them.  Concentrate on ideas and tough leadership,  which we clearly lack now…

So was it OK when Romney’s pac’s did the same things to Newt and others first or are they somehow exempt from your rage?

paul,, that’s a fine damn good answer gump.
  if you wasn’t such a fine damn good religious person,
   id recommend you for general someday

Tell that to Cool Hand

She bit for Mitt?   So tragic. 

So you’re all for Mitt but you’d prefer he be Newtered first. OK, but give Santorum a prayer.

Ann sold us out for a moderate at best as she can’t help herself and her lust for Chris Christie… where was she and where is she with Mitt’s PAC making lies about Newt in Iowa and Santorum in SC. She’s a hippocrite who is lying to us stating Romney’s a conservative. I used to admire her until she sold out. Ann, look in the mirror when OBAMA gets another four years because of your stupidity in believing he’s electable. You’re whining about his BAIN association and how the Dems lied and he easily lost to Kennedy. Well you idiot, it’s going to happen again and yet you tell us he’s electable. Once again, you stupid idiot, wake up and look at the candidate who represents our values not the one you’ve decided to drop to your knees for! For those that don’t like this tone, I merely and purposely took her tone in how she writes and describes Elites. No more no less for the moron!

Mitt couldn’t beat McCain,  McCain couldn’t beat Obama, so it makes perfect sense to Ann to nominate the second loser.    Yes, this will work.

You’re an idiot! I would prefer you keep your recomendations to yourself. It’s clear to everyone this world would be a better place without them. Show some sense and go pray why don’t you?

I’ll gladly give you your first “like”….as far as setting your shirt on fire…I hope you were not planning on wearing it at the same time…lol..

Good evening toasty! Nice to see ya! : )

Still waiting on those Fed-Ex ribs mylady….lol…

First draft needs some work ☻☻☻☺☺☺

Ron Paul has received more campaign contributions from the military than all the other candidates together.

I don’t care who gets it you send those pronto…lol…

Earmarks!

How about Mitt Romney, Pres., Newt Gingrich VP (and turned loose on Congress, C. Rice Secretary of State, Santorum, the reorganized Health Education Department or Defence. However I too would love to see Newt debate Obama. 

Heh heh heh! Nah, I was mearly unsure about where to put my finger,heh heh!

What “rage” are you talking about? I think all of the personal attacks are a bunch of bunk and should be avoided, by every candidate. The policies of the candidates are what matters, not Bain Capital or any of the other trash. 

Ah, yes. Nothing like your first daft.

Gladly, I share no values or principles with Newt Gingrich, as mine actually exist.

Jack Abramoff, the king of DC corruption: Gingrich epitomizes everything that is wrong with the cesspool of corruption in DC.

No one knows a rat better than another rat.

It is unconscionable to expediently ignore Gingrich’s unconscionable life of hypocrisy, amorality and now blatant cynical deceit.

BBL

Tony, your suggestion that the republicans commit suicide and give Obo the Clown four more years, instead of nominating the most electable conservative, has been noted…and properly filed…ROMNEY 2012 Because our kids shouldn’t be forced into serfdom to support the laziest amongst us…

The NJ Gov made a comment the other day about some guy criticizing his heft, in which he said the guy was so ignorant he should not be allowed a platform.  Methinks that is a decidedly leftist way of looking at the First Amendment.  The last guy I heard say something like that was John Kerry.  I guess if you’re in charge, you should get to decide who is ignorant and who is not, and prohibit them from expressing their opinion accordingly. 

I have no problem with Christi responding to this idiot, and ripping him a new one…. but when he starts advocating for shutting him down because he’s “ignorant”, that’s a decided claim on leftist bona fides.

Why..yes I’am….lol..ribwithdrall…I think is what you meant…

I have an older brother that can do it with one hand. For real! He lost an arm when he was 6. Awesome thing to see…..  : )

That you Obamaniacs go straight (I know, that’s an oxymoron) to the ad hominem but proves the veracity – in this instance – of Miss Coulter’s post. And that you and 0=Zero and his gang have nothing to offer but to distract from him. 

Too bad Miss Coulter’s researches and writings are about the RINO, Mittens, though — and are not in support of a Republican.

Texas Governor, Rick Perry, say.

Who knew Roley Poleys were so damn mean?

Sorry for the length of this ( boy if I had a nickel for every time I had to say that):

His last residence was in
Beavertown, Pennsylvania, where he lived with Freda until
his death on December 29, 1975. He was 64. Euell died of a
heart attack. It was probably a result of cardiovascular
disease complicating a pre-existing condition called Marfan
syndrome. Marfan syndrome would have made his aorta more
susceptible to a catastrophic bursting. Euell had a smoking
habit and regularly, as can be seen in his writings, added
saturated fats (bacon grease, butter, egg yolks) to his
vegetables. In E
u e
l l’s
day it was not unusual to smoke cigarettes or to add
high amounts of saturated fat to foods. These risk factors
combined with his hard life and lack of exercise in his
later years (arthritis pain limited his movement)
undoubtedly contributed to his death.

I just want to know when Ann is finished writing about her “new” love, Mitt Romney, so I can go back to caring about her columns. I say “Rewt for Newt!”

That’s what I said….I was not going tot do all the leg work.

Good job on that!

Who cares about CAIR?

What do they share!  Sharia law from where?

They get in our hair with what they will dare.

We stand and we stare at the preaching from CAIR,

as they pepper the air with their evil racist fare.

Lack of protein strikes again! 

I wonder of he walked around mumbling to himself about fat people?

Don’t give them any idea’s…good God man…lol

Funny you should mention light bulbs.

I like it!

But Stop it!  LOL!!!

DITTO! Brian. Will do!

It Glowingly brilliant!

Legalize all drugs!

Let Iran get the nuclear bomb!

Create a stronger national defense by cutting funding by half!

I know what you mean….I can’t find my car keys either!

Then you need to stay home….lol…

Hahahahahaha

I am just being goofy. The lack of troll blood on my boots makes me delirious!

I think Paul is selling himself short.  Why wait until Iran develops a nuke.  We could sell some to them now and close the national debt a bit.

You left the forum open again?!
Great! No wonder. You are in big trouble.

Don’t let the cat out.

Paul should use the tactic, “The founding fathers didn’t have anything at all to say on whether or not we should let Iran get nukes.”  It would be true, AND make as much sense as the rest of his positions on foreign policy.

Way to go Andy! That was cool! heh heh…….

And we say “Got any oil to spare?”.

And I would be still just as confused!

I like it!

Has anybody produced a Ron Paul candy bar yet?  It HAS to be coming down the pike.

…can we be civil whenever possible?…

I heard Ron Paul is so short… he can’t see Russia from Sarah Palin’s back yard.

Sweet on the outside and nutty on the inside?

Hmmmm………

We don’t ask for the oil…we steal it…  Don’t you still have some Iraqi oil laying around the house?

loyd

be nice to the girl bubba

Another Newtonian Big Idea!

I LIKE IT!!!!   (with a really really really short fuse)

That stuff? I traded it for a bunch of ivory and some storage sheds for my migrant workers to sleep in.

I added on to my McMansion and bought another Rolls.

You are most welcome!

That goes for me too, ULA!

THANK YOU , SIR!

Gotta take issue with you in the quote department, gene.

The exact quote is “A zebra does not change its spots.” (http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2011/01/25/19-way-to-exasperate-a-liberal-lampoon-al-gore-for-something-he-didnt-say-citing-a-book-that-doesnt-exist/

Please make sure to quote Al Gore correctly.

I very much agree with you about principle and character, although Ron Paul’s character has taken a severe hit with revelations of the bigotry he allowed to be published in his newsletter. 

And please don’t insult my intelligence with an assertion it wasn’t his doing. My career field is published communication. I know better.

As a Jeffersonian, I agree with many of Paul’s principles and have voted for him. But my principles don’t include relying on a Fortress America — a concept that was outgrown 70 years ago.

Had the United States not entered WW II when it did — which was almost too late — the world would almost certainly have been conquered by the Nazis. In the process they would have used their superiority in rocketry, jet power, nuclear fission and other weapons technology to fry the United States before taking over its remnants.

This scenario has been outlined in considerable detail in this message board more than once in recent weeks.

The jihadists have declared war on the West, whether or not you choose to acknowledge it. Paul is blind to that fact and all that it signals.

Even if there were no such thing as Islam, Red China poses an existential threat to the West as well.

Ron Paul’s vision must be integrated into public policy if the Republic is to recover. But the United States must be able to defend itself from enemies without as well as within, and that requires initiatives Paul is unwilling to accept.

He doesn’t stand a chance of winning the nomination, by the way. 

Iraqi oil you burn in your car.  Vietnamese oil you burn in your wok.

Petroleum versus peanut.

Hollow points?…lol

Were you out with a liberal woman again?

You teabaggers are the whiniest wimps I’ve ever seen. The party of personal responsibility my ass.Fear and “it’s someone elses fault” is all you have to offer.  It’s a good thing our solders don’t come from your stock or I’d be typing this in the new china of USA. Your weakness is epic. Now you fight among yourselves like rabid dogs, throwing The GnOP message and party plank in total disarray. The DNC and Obama according to PEW is going to put their foot through your butts like paper mache.` Wake up morons, you just lost Wisconsin! OWS is going to drive you nuts over the edge.

Naw……. hollow points are a waste on trolls.  There’s nothing of substance in them to make the round mushroom.  Ball ammo is for trolls.

Oh, you kid.

I ain’t touchin that one.

;p

I will.

Courtesy Flush!!!!

Fibbey.

Where in the CA National Guard?  I was in a Readiness Group.

I got a 22. rifle with a scope that you can drive in tacks with at 40 yards…thinking that will work…lol..

My last posting was as Commandant of HHC, 49th MP Brigade, Alameda.

Correction! A Texas girl who would not give you that choice! Not neccesary!

LMAO! Still…ya might wanna spray some air freshener.

LOL

Yea….but the Geezer is feeling better now, he might go on the warpath if the Colonel dropped by again.

Heh heh heh,

I thought he looked good as the colonel.

Me too, but he didn’t think it was very damn funny.  LOL

I was at the Readiness Group, Presidio of San Francisco from Jan 91-Jan 95 when I retired. 

You ever go inside that ginormous gym they had?  Out a little door in the back was an indoor 50 meter pool.

Very good points, and I fully concur.  I do wish that I could avoid using the old adage “the best way to predict the future is to review the past” when thinking of Gingrich, morally speaking, but I do believe that he best exemplifies my position on where our country needs to go now.

HHHAAAA…

Beck is mormon, he will go mormon.

LMAO

The ex-wife has said Gingrich proposed to her before the divorce from his first wife was final in 1981. Her marriage to Gingrich ended in divorce in 2000. Gingrich admitted he’d already taken up with Callista Bisek, his third wife.

Gingrich has said he has no relationship with his second wife.  (What is the PC term?  Truth challenged?)

Well Andeeee, you r just full of good ideas! heh heh

Beyond not being aggressive enough, Romney did not so much have a hard time defending his record at Bain than he was given a hard time defending that record. Gingrich’s major scoring points during the debates have not been against Romney. Yet, Romney would do well to read and heed your observation.

Romney will do, at least, equally as well as Gingrich in a debate against Obama.

DMTyler

What does anything you just said have to do with Gingrich having a relationship with his ex-wife?

Truth-challenged?

What does any of it have to do with Newt’s conservative track record?

You weren’t a speech writer for Colonel Sanders.  You WERE Colonel Sanders.  LOL!!
(I’m saluting)

DO YOU REALLY THINK WE ARE AFRAID OF THIS IDIOT?? LMAO!!!

http://thepeoplescube.com/peoples_resource/image/10317

Try this for History,
Romney signed and suported Legislation in MA for Gay Marriage. Now he opposes gay marriage.
Romney sgned pro Abortion legislation as Gov. Now he says he’s Pro Life.
This change came from pressure from LDS CHurch, who Mitt(ens) was embarressing
as he touted his Mormanism, while being Pro Child Murder.
Mitt(ens supported TARP and Pres Bush when he needed to abandon capitalism to save capitalism.
Mitt(ens also supported Climate change, then backed off that issue when it was clear
the People do not.
Romuls also suported Cap and Trade until the people spoke very clearly, we don’t support
Cap and Trade.
is this enough History fro you to at least think about your support of a Liberal?

Yeah,

I knew you were a lib.  Thought so on the other sites.

Personally, I can’t wait for him to have to defend his actions as president.

Newt’s wife wants to stab him.  Wow, great news.

So how is Solnydra doing?

How about Fast and Furious?

What is going to happen when our candidate makes short work of Obama’s jobs record?

What happens when oil is about 5/gal by Memorial Day?

Yes, I think he better fear us.

BTW, how soon you guys forgot your own primary in 2008.  3am anyone?

yeah….but there’s a setup for some more class warfare buried in there somewhere…..

He had Jimmy Carter and a few media people start that shit today and yesterday, so…he didn’t forget about his deck of race cards.

It all went downhill for me after “Teabag.”  LOL!!!

Lester the Molester has shown up!

Ha ha ha! yeah you got that right! But in all fairness once the swelling went down, I helped im change his transmission! heh heh! Can you dig it?

     Thank you, many more to come.

I’m confused…. does DFN mean “Dickless Fairey Nazi” or “Dumb Funkin’ Nazi”?

It’s not a picture of Barney Frank trying to teach Rachel Muncher how to handle a teabag, is it?

Noot has a checkered past.

Slick Willard’s entire political posture is woven out of the purest silken strands of lies, not even second to the Obamanator.

Refute any of redstate.com’s findings before you anonymize:

http://www.redstate.com/erick/files/2011/10/FLIPFLOPS.pdf  

Your argument falls apart by observing the facts. The fact is Mitt Romney is winning. If one were to go with your logic, Mitt Romney should be losing badly. You may not like the guy, but a lot of people obviously think he has the stuff necessary to win a National Election and a majority are voting for him.

NEVER EVER VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!111

So? My ex-wife is a vindictive bitch too…What does that prove?

Trying to ‘Cain’ Newt is so left wing. Good job!

I ‘m guessing your DUMBASS took one too many TEA BAGS to the face and your brain shook loose.

Fleabagging dipshit!

Hahahahahahahaahaha,

Do you know why that is?  LOL.

And it is a national security disaster waiting to happen.

My point, my dear Horatio, is jut this: “Ad Homonym is as Ad Homonym” does. Whether it’s BrObama’s wife, or Newt’s, or anyone else’s. Unless they are ashamed of America a’forehand, it’s not important.

I’am thinking not much makes sense to you…

And they have the nerve to criticize us?  We the 99% object!

                ~*~   NOT!   ~*~

I’ll try to talk in short words.

If ABC were trying to protect Noot, they would not have said they have dirt on Noot until after the vote, if at all.

If ABC is trying to tar Noot with out the goods to do the job, they would make dark suggestions they have dirt. Voila!

If ABC did NOT want Mitt to win, it would be taking on any of these issues in a probe of Mitt’s mental stability:
http://www.redstate.com/erick/files/2011/10/FLIPFLOPS.pdf 

99% Overruled.

And stop tearing up private property or its no teabag for you!!

If you can’t understand that post, then you really shouldn’t embarrass yourself by coming to a political blog.

While hiking down along the border this morning, I saw a Muslim extremist fall into the Rio Grande River . He was struggling to stay afloat because of all the guns and bombs he was carrying.Along with him was a Mexican who was also struggling to stay afloat because of the large backpack of drugs that was strapped to his back. If they didn’t get help, they’d surely drown.Being a responsible Texan and abiding by the law to help those in distress, I informed the El Paso County Sheriff ‘s Office and Homeland Security.It is now 4 PM, both have drowned, and neither authority has responded. I’m starting to think I wasted two stamps.

Occupy?

The cavities of your Communal Hillary Clinton blow up doll?

They are in to obtain a fast track to citizenship, LOL.  The article doesn’t mention that does it.  It cuts off at people leaving after 2 years.

Don’t you notice the progression?

First endorsement of Christie.

Then bouquets for Rahmney.

The only question is whether Coulter will choose one more intermediary even further to the left or if she’ll reveal her true choice for president next: Bill Maher.

Actually… I think this is great.  By the time Newt gets around to ripping upo Obama one on one, he be fully inoculated.

That’s gonna be a real treat!

Sorry for the length:

The Democrats and the liberal media have said that the Occupy Party
was a civic group “just like” the Tea Party.

I report……you decide…….

REPORTED         OCCUPY PARTY     TEA PARTY
 
ARRESTS             4149+             0
 
  
RAPES                 12              0
 
DAMAGE         $10,000,000.00        $0
 
PUBLIC DEFECATION    YES             NO
 
ANTISEMITIC RANTS     12              0
 
COST TO TAXPAYERS $19,327,487.00+    $0
 
PUBLIC MASTURBATION    3              0
 
MOLOTOV COCKTAILS     10              0
 
FIGHTS STARTED       YES             NO
 
CHILDREN EXPLOITED   YES             NO
 
POLICE CARS DAMAGED    2              0
 
PUBLIC DRUNKENNESS   YES             NO
 
DRUG POSS. ARREST    YES             NO
 
WEAPON ARREST        YES             NO
 
DRUG OVERDOSE        YES             NO
 
THEFTS               YES             NO
 
BURGLARIES           YES             NO
 
VANDALISM ARREST     YES             NO
 
TRESPASSING ARREST   YES             NO
 
NON FATAL SHOOTINGS    1              0
 
PUBLIC URINATION     YES             NO
 
URINATION ON OTHERS  YES             NO
 
ISRAELI FLAGS BURNED   2              0
 
AMERICAN FLAGS BURNED  1              0
 
AMER.FLAGS DANCED ON   1              0
 
AMER.FLAG DESECRATION 25              0
 
FELONYASSLT ON AN EMT  1              0
 
LICE OUTBREAKS         1              0
 
TUBERCULOSIS OUTBREAKS 1              0
 
MURDER                 1              0
 
SUICIDE                1              0
 
  
SHOTS AT WHITE HOUSE   1              0
 
SCABIES OUTBREAKS      1              0
 
OBAMA ENDORSED IT    YES             NO
 
PELOSI ENDORSED IT   YES             NO
 
CAIR ENDORSED IT     YES             NO
 
SOCIALIST PARTY      YES             NO
 
NAZI PARTY ENDORSED  YES             NO
 
MUSLIM BROTHERHOOD   YES             NO
 
COMMUNIST PARTY      YES             NO
 
BIDEN ENDORSED       YES             NO
 
HUGO CHAVEZ ENDORSED YES             NO
 
BLACK PANTHERS       YES             NO
 
HEZBOLLAH ENDORSED   YES             NO
 
MARXIST UNION        YES             NO
 
9/11 TRUTHER         YES             NO
 
BOLSHEVIK ENDORSED   YES             NO
 
IRAN GOVERNMENT      YES             NO
 
AYATOLLAH ENDORSED   YES             NO
 
NORTH KOREA ENDORSED YES             NO
 
FARRAKHAN ENDORSED   YES             NO
 
NATION OF ISLAM      YES             NO
 

Oh yes, I see the similarities now……..

“But I’m really not here to be poplar,….”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Pigs don’t wallow in their own sh!t to smell like flowers either.

   I’ve made no secret of my leanings. I despise everything you and most on this site stand for, and am proud of it! All you had to do is ask.
AGAIN why should OBAMA fear you t-baggs and the GnOP when you guys are completely ass backwards, shooting each other in the face.
One stupid scandal after another.( 1st herman cain, now grinch again)
The front runner is not even poplar with his own, and is being forced on the RePugs.
Ru Paul is yours, and yours only. (I don’t even have to elaborate)
Romney is about to get reamed about his taxes.
Look I can go on, but the point is you guys are nothing! Instead of Klan rally race baiting like the debate, you better come up with a plan for the general clowns. We’re taking you out once and for all, no joke and even less play. Now I have other sites to monitor. Just look for the Battle Cruiser.

And this is a brain with no activity  – - – - – - – - – You talk like pond scum!

I didn’t say there was no scandal.

Please read.

What I said is that the scandal took place over 10 years ago, was fully exposed in the papers, and now his wife is feeling a bit vindictive.

Obama is an easy target for Gingrich.  Sorry that you guys don’t seem to understand that.

In Pink Battle Cruiser Gear, with a pink Battle Cruiser Dildo in each teabag-stroking hand!!!!  LOL!!!

I made up a split-screen poster.  On one side was a picture of the idiot taking a dump on the cop car, and the other side had Pelosi pointing at him and smiling with the caption underneath:

“God bless them for their spontaneity,” Pelosi told reporters. “It’s young, it’s
spontaneous, it’s focused and it’s going to be effective.”

I should have had a bunch printed up and sold them.

heh heh heh woof woof woof!!!

Do you think she meant his regularity?  LOL!!!

Every Democrat says that they fear Romney the most.  It is a Democrat party talking point.  So do you really think that the Democrats fear Romney in any way?  He is Obama light;  why vote for the faux Obama when you can have the real thing.

As far as the dirt on Gingrich goes;  have you ever thought the reason they withhold the interview is that they (the media) are waiting for a more propitious time to damage his campaign?

If not for Ross Perot Bush would have beaten Clinton going away. But, I wouldn’t rule out the possibility of a spoiler being Obummers path to re-election. I think Donald Trump, who has been a Democrat, may be setting that up. And, naturally Ron Paul who has done it in the past.  We saw that tactic with Harry Reid and the fake T-Party candidate. I think to win over the Democrat cheat Machine, Republicans are going to have to win by a big margin. 

NEVER EVER VOTE FOR A DEMOCRAT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!11

We’ve had this discussion before.  Nazi’s like BIG, OPPRESSIVE, FREEDOM ROBBING, ALL_POWERFUL, TOTALLY-CONTROLLING government.  In other words… they’re liberals.

Lend me your Pink Boa and I’ll distract them while you slink away like a gerbil in Barney Frank’s apartment.  LOL!!!

Every time. Fleabaggers stick together like shit in shit.

Cool. What say we then dig into Mitt’s decades of covering for his church’s refusal to admit blacks into full membership? Decades of stonewalling or supporting the “old way,” followed by a sudden explosion of empathy for the victims of discrimination once he became a presidential contender.

 No you’re the teabagger Jackass. Not my fault you’re too stipid to find out what it meant first.

I guess he’s just getting to that stuff now, not realizing everyone else got past it about a month ago.  Oh well.

This are the same networks who covered up John Edwards having a baby with an assistant while his wife was REALLY dying of cancer!
 
The media tells who they endorse with this one….Gingrich is an easy target for OBAMA…so lets not report anything bad about Newt!
 
 

Joe.. are you really  “stipid”?  I didn’t know that about you!

Damnit Joe!  You never told me you were stipid!!!

Thanks for coming by…we were getting bored without a dip shit FLEABAGGER to kick the shit out of.

Come back soon in your Pink Dildo Battleship and we will blow more holes in it.

DUMBASS!!!

Move back to Israel jewbot!

Reagan couldn’t beat Ford.  Ford couldn’t beat Carter.  So it would follow Reagan couldn’t beat Carter?

  But, guess what happened four years later?  It was Reagan by a landslide.

We knew what it meant. We just didn’t realize you were willing to give up your claim to the term so easily.
I guess you could have warned us if your mouth wasn’t full.

In your wet dreams I am sure! You just keep tellin yourself that………

Hey I type slow and he doesn’t understand me…whats up…

Nope.

And you’re a libturd and demoncrap. 

And one who neither checks his facts or knows what he is talking about.

In other words:

A ordinary run-of-the-mill libturd and demoncrap.

Flagged as inappropriate – racist.

R O F L M A O  two times!!!

Hahahahahhaahahahahahahhahahahahahaa

It had to come out.

It just had to.

LOL

Hahahahahahahhahahahahahaahaha

And who’s side is he on.

Hahahahhahahahahahahhahaha

Hasbrainot

Flagged as inappropriate – racist.

Hey Melbo,

Do you see who likes your posts now?

LOL

Haahahahahaahahahahahhahaa

Gingrich can debate. No question. There are 2 count them 2 Presidential Debates. You cannot destroy Obama in 2 debates. Newt will be a miserable arrogant President. Think again before you vote for 2 debates or 4 years of a President who gets things done, efficiently, effectively. You cannot pull the wool over Romneys eyes on economic matters. He will know if he is getting bad info because he knows the economy. That is where we are being destroyed.

He stipid!

Yeah. With a name like Molester Enema he had to be a Nazi.

I wish Toad were here! That would put the cherry on top of this thread tonite!

You leaving for the Gaza strip anytime soon?  I hear it’s just wonderful this time of year.
A real hamas heaven.

And that was just tonight.

By the end of the week he will be melba1,999,999,999,999

You can learn a lot from a dummy.
So it must be a parrot and a jackass.

Why would you believe a rat who’s only virtue is as a lier and crook.  

We were tossing around other ideas about who it was, but I have been convinced for a long time.  Especially after he shyed away from copying his own picture in my avatar. 

I can’t believe that a 70 year old is that petty and immature…..what a minute….yes I can!

What kind of psychosis obscures the fact that the news media have been Borking Noot since 1994?

They’ve been targeting the soft spots in everyone’s history but Mitt. They can’t ignore the stupid remarks he makes like trying to bet $10K or laughing off $400,000 in speaking fees. But they’re carefully waiting until the nomination to go after Romneycare, his hiring of illegals, his “dark” history toward welcoming blacks in his church and his incredible shape shifting.

Just like McCain.

I’ll try to talk in short words.
 If ABC were trying to protect Noot, they would not have said they have dirt on Noot until after the vote, if at all.
 If ABC is trying to tar Noot with out the goods to do the job, they would make dark suggestions they have dirt. Voila!

Stop it!

NO WAIT…..That was good. I even read all of it! Good post!

LOL!

Did you forget to hear the news from respected men in the business world? Newts 27 minute  film purchased from a documentry film maker is completely false! The men interviewed by Megan Kelly and Oreilly said the film was distorted. They both recieved raises and promotions when Bain was managing the Co. Bain did not close their co. A Canadian  Co that purchased it did. Romney is an honest businessman that you refuse to believe because of your own bias. He will make the best President because he has the training, knowlege and ability to do the Job. I definately will hire him.

Your free lunch awaits you—

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=FrTbnczYAd4&feature=player_embedded 

TANSTAAFL

Beat me to it TDO!ha ha ha!

i haven’t the time tooo waste on a fat ass woman
  setting at a computer eatin pizza and gasing up the room,
   with a name like bibby or whatever it was

First you have to take it out of your ass!!!

Newts record and debating ability says different.

Santorum will make a great VP though.

It’s more like an ex-parrot.

I don’t have to, do I?

lol

Bing……your door prize awaits…lol..

I could care less about Romney’s religion.

I am against Romney for a very simple reason and I bet I can get you to make my case.

Name one conservative thing that Romney has ever done in public office.

You clearly haven’t spent much time here if you think the supporters of McCain now support Gingrich.  Pretty-much 99% of the folks here that support Gingrich were ADAMANTLY opposed to McCain, who they saw as a RINO of the first order.  If anything, it’s the current Romney (who, by the way, the conservatives here also see as a RINO) supporters that supported McCain  You got it just back-asswards.

LMAO!

Not for me!

Now let me see. . . can we actually trust anything that you have to say with regard to Mitt Rhombus?

You have made a second career of trying to gloss over his liberalism.  You have zero credibility on the subject.  Indeed, you have totally discredited yourself as a conservative.

Just for the record, point has never been that capitalism is bad.  Of course, conservatives do not believe that.  Even so, anyone who has spent any amount of time in the rough-and-tumble business world knows (and knows quite well) that men of bad character are not rare in that world.

Given Mitt Rhombus’ rank dishonesty in the world of politics, I would not be at in the least surprised to find that he had demonstrated similarly bad character as a businessman.  A rogue often proves his rogishness in multiple spheres of action.  A man who abuses helpless animals, for example, is often found to have abused wife and children, too.  To thine own self be true.

By the way, there is a documented case of Mitt Rhombus willfully mistreating his dog.

Well stated… but he won’t understand it.  He’s too stipid.

Would it have hurt to point out David Duke was an OWS fan? 

Really.

Ah,

And you believe her.

Yea…the marxist idiot that was here earlier said that too.

I am sure I missed more than that one.

I should coordinate the list with GGG.

Now I should’ve figured that! heh heh!

TDO how’s the fat fuck
  with a smart mouth
 is that one of your kinfolk’s

I was gonna go look because I know what a coward he is, but I forgot. Did he win again?

lmao

Oh… I voted for him…… but I had to hold my nose to do it. And I might not have done even that if Palin hadn’t joined his campaign.

That was so mean, jas. 

Is your polling place in a swimming pool?

lol

I vote for Mittens in the primary and after McCain got the nod, I went libertarian.

I will never do it again!

Not a chance…just the braying of a truly incompetent woman with no sense!

Amen!

i didn’t know it was your sister

Your a foul mouth no nothing that has nothing to live by…other than your foul mouth that is….he who swears freely across his tongue has nothing in his heart or mind…

I know about liberal hell holes. My condolences.

I didn’t.

I look at the presidency a lot different than most here.  I think he would have been a decent president and we would have gotten him out of the Senate.

I gotta go watch “Inside the NFL”, and see if they are finally giving the Niners some respect.  Y’all take care of each other.  GBA, GBOT.

And I hope we have all learned out lessons.

Every time I scrolled past it something didn’t look right. 

Amen!

Borders:  Closed…
Language:  English only…
Culture: Constitution, and the Bill of Rights!!!
Drug Free: Make a drug screen mandatory for congress and
For anyone on welfare and / or food stamps!
NO freebies to Non-Citizens!

Do you talk  that way in front of your mother? I’ll just bet you do….don’t you?

Ya got my vote!

Skelton, and come back saloon.

Well,

ULA has the right idea.

Good night and God bless all on this thread.

I don’t believe he has the words in his brain to form into a normal sentence in the first place.  I would call it brainus innteruptus!!!

Maybe the witches behind the movement cast a spell on you.

When I have more time, I will argue those with you.

But to start with, why don’t you look up Fred Thompson’s senate vote to convict Clinton.

Then explain it to me.

Good night TDO.
God bless you and yours.

Thank you , Thank you very much 

Nite TDO! God Bless! Skelton!

Skelton

Skelton Andy!

I am outta here too!

Skelton Peeps!

See you Joe.
Skelton backatcha!

See you Andy.
Don’t take any Liberal BS.

I’ll ask him if I get the chance.

The big knock on Fred was that he was lazy and/or unambitious. His wife — remember her? — probably wore him out.

What great first lady material though.

Hi Ribbey. You know, if you should ever decide to host an advice column, I think “Dear Ribbey” has a nice ring to it.
Just sayin’.

hmmmmm…………Uh……….NO!

ha ha ha ha! : )

Yeah, I’ll just bet. he he he…..

He’s a human being so of course he isn’t pure but this is a non-issue.

People, I had nothing to do with setting up that comment.

Ah, so you have studied Mitten Man.

Lol. Not sure how I caused that.

That’s my point! I don’t even know the man,and me not even being the brightest bulb in the box can tell you that he’s not the marrying kind, but what pray tell me has that got to do with whether he would make a good president or not?

Good one Jerry! heh heh!

The missing link.

Human appearance.

Rino innards.

Thank you, advice columnist.

Maybe this isn’t your hour of power.

“Just get lost in the thread, Fred.
“Make a new plan, Stan.”
– Paul Simon

Mitten Man remains can be easily identified by the prominently upturned proboscis and the loosely tousled ascot.

Well here’s your chance Tony, explain exactly what it is that is bad about his foreign policy.

Awww man! I got the dissapearing posted blues!

Do you suppose there’s a version of the song for people who don’t get along with their dogs?

Fifty ways to leave your Rover.

Man. I used to like that show.

There is a two-pun minimum.

Thanks fellas! I WAS gonna let that one roll on by, but Noooooooo……..heh heh

Vic Morrow had a Steve McQueen presence. Big loss when his head got chopped off.

You can find video on the web of the helicopter accident that killed him and a couple of Vietnamese kids.

Anyway, the show is probably viewable by you if you check the listings.

I’ve seen a couple dozen episodes now. Some are as good as any war depictions on TV. Some aren’t as good.

You’ll be gratified to know that “Combat!” is followed by “Twelve O’Clock High” — with lots of visuals of B-17s and some other warbirds, but the action sequences are actual WW II film. Grain, black and white, shaky.

I thought that’s where Jack lives.

I used to watch the Robert Conrad show, what was it called, Black Sheep Squadron or something. I recall they did the same thing.

Hey Allen West is on Fox. No he does’nt but maybe I should teach im….

Oh Lord, stuck in low die again.

I don’t understand. Your Labrador is on the thread? Or a fox is on the thread?

I’m slow to understand.

They deep-sixed a lot of those planes after the war. Should have sold them to people for 100 bucks a pop.

No her dog is on Fox and Allen West is posting here…

Nothing that sinister. They are stolen by a murderous post gargoyle to be used in a magic spell to steal your soul.
Wait….what did you say happens to them?

You had to watch original episodes of “Twilight Zone” to understand anything Jerry says.  LOL!!!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
A state of being I like to refer to as “out in the cornfield”.

They were worth more as scrap metal. Planes, tanks, ships, artillery, whatever. Lots were sold to allies in different continents and eventually made their way back here.

I visited a guy north of Chicago who had acres and acres of heavy warbirds in a field. Fuselages, radial engines on blocks, flying surfaces, various whatevers, all rusting away. Most numerous were P-47s Thunderbolts.

I got a report last year of someone with all kinds of war surplus stuff in the same general area, but not restricted to aircraft.

Oh no, this is’nt gonna be another corn hole story is it?

Oh, another Robert Conrad character — from The Wild, Wild West.

His sister is Honey West. Or was.

It was an abysmal suggestion.

Just so they don’t head in a westoast direction.

Okay, Mungo. I’ve been here so long I have to take a big Mitt.

Who is “us”?  Are YOU in physical danger from a sane foreign policy? Are you in the armed forces? If so, your only danger of getting killed is if Ron Paul does not get elected.

Okay, so this fun and all and I have been sort of paying attention. But I have to ask. Who is this Mitt Romney person?

I agree. Time for us to take a time out on everyone else’s wars and stop manufacturing horror stories to get the populace excited about another war (Iran) we do not need.

REDEYE is on!!!

Mitt who?….This is just to much fun..just play ball who needs a mitt….

I just dropped in, to see what condition my condition was in…..

Darn it
Couldn’t post the lyrics I just wrote to the tune of Honey Comb.
It was a bit much.

Well, fella’s, take it away! I’m outta here! Skelton!

Good night, and good news. Pay no mind to the gerbils.

squealsquealsquealsquealsquealsqueal

Yup. I wrote earlier that you can find video on the web of the helicopter accident. The crashed copter’s rotors beheaded at least one of a couple of small Vietnamese kids and I think Morrow too.

The director was brought up on manslaughter charges but I think slipped the noose.

you tooo! God bless ya!

Are you having fun at my expense?…lol…

I don’t know……… Are you willing to pick up the tab?

Depends and I don’t the kind we’ll be wearing later in life…you sound like an expensive date…I suspect you only drink top shelf…

I resent that. I have done two deployments to Afghanistan and never once killed some poor innocent goat herder just trying to mind his own business. 

 Maybe if I am stirred. But if I am shaken, anything will do.

Boy, are you guys reaching.

Hey it’s late….

Why yes it was….nice catch….

Wasn’t the matchstick Navy impressive?

May you be late, then trip on the way to the polling station Tony

Hey who turn off the lights?…

Well save it with the light on will ya…not in the dark…

“His [Paul's] dislike of the military is far left of Obama.” said Tony. Plainly and simply a vicious lie. His dislike is of world-wide meddler commander-in-chief’s defective policies. Did you notice how active duty US servicemen love Ron Paul more than 6 to 1 over all the other Republican candidates, both in ’08 and now? Or have you snoozed?

NUTCASE u say? Well I am convinced that if you Paul-haters had lived in AD 26 or 27 Palestine you would’ve sided with the Scribes and the Pharisees. “Leave ‘em alone” Jesus said, “they are blind guides and if a blind man leads a another blind man, they will both fall into a pit.” Yeah that’s your hardened-hearts for sure

That’s called “deflection.”

Wrong on several accounts wdelpilar. The newsletter was on autopilot while he worked as a surgeon. He asserts he did not write the passages and repudiates their sentiments. Everyone that knows Paul in the least says the writing is completely out of character for him. The head of the Texas NAACP backs Ron Paul.  Nevertheless Paul did accept responsibility for the letters since they were was published under his name. If that’s the most irresponsible thing Paul’s done (and what more has ever been found) have you no better attestation to incomptetnce of the man that that?

By the way the mystery writer was identified and he is a professor at a SF Bay area university. His writings have some of the exact same phrasing as the letters so there is little doubt. You’ll find this with a google or two and you can judge for yourself.  Paul’s character is unassailable so far, and it shows that he harbors less rancor than any person I’ve observed on the US political scene with the possible exception of Ronald Reagan.

Dude he got the partial audit of the Federal Reserve through. That will turn out to be significant, likely history is in the making. He’s been a doctor a good part of his life, and now he has resigned his seat in the House of Representatives. Career politician? Less than most that’s for sure. 

Glad to you your values support repeated adultery and kissing up to  Pelosi !  Newt gets 1.6 Million for “consulting” and Santorum millions from lobbying.  Santorum also voted against right to work laws.  Romney seems to offend you and the other prejudice anti mormons because he made money as a capitalist!  When Nutty Nut and Wild Rickey make deals with democrats they are being realistic but when Romney does the same thing with a state legislature that is 85% democrat he sells out?  With that type of logic and IQ you should support Perry

Saying Newt is anti-capitalist because he attacks the way Romney approaches capitalism is no different from saying he’s racist because he attacks the way Obama approaches governance.  Both are misdirection.  Neither has any validity.

Sherry: although I do have a preference I will, as I said, support whoever is the nominee, any way possible. It is imperative we replace obama. Ordinally I thought Perry might be a good choice, but he managed to convince me he wasn’t with his refusal to complete the border fence. Obama has been trying, for three years now, to overwhelm and destroy our capitalist free enterprise system. With intent to replace it with a form of fascism with himself as permanent totalitarian dictator. Consequently, obama is the one that convinced me he had to be voted out in November, 2012. I did not vote for Clinton but could accept him because he was not an evil man, just a liar. Obama is both evil and a conniving compulsive liar! McCain was not my choice in 2008 but I voted for him because, I thought obama was just exactly what he turned out to be. A self centered do nothing nobody who would be over his head as a janitor. It is plain to me as it should be to everyone, obama is out to destroy this great nation.

Could this be why Ann is for Romney (a segment from Log Cabin Republicans website): 

“. . . Governor Mitt Romney has established himself as a candidate who can unite Republicans and a clear threat to Barack Obama in November,” said R. Clarke Cooper, Log Cabin Republicans Executive Director. “Governor Romney was consistently clear in the debates that he opposes discrimination based on sexual orientation. While he continues to support a constitutional amendment banning marriage equality – a position Log Cabin strongly opposes – he is also on record saying that such an amendment has been tried, rejected, and is unlikely to ever succeed. Romney has also taken a position that the repeal of ‘Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell’ has been settled, and he would not seek to reinstitute the ban on open service.”  Remember, she spoke at the gay event HOMOCON in 2010 an act considered unconscionably against conservative principles by WorldNetDaily who then dropped her from their “Taking Back America conference. 
Has she bought into the gay agenda and that’s why Romney is so palatable to her?

It is clear now that Ann has a hard on for Romney.

Romney is the GOP candidate.  Newt does not have a chance.  Neither does Paul.Romney will never be able to beat Barry.Unless unemployment gets to 10%.  Ain’t gonna happen.  (Even if it does [and actually already is], Barry will continue to manipulate the data.)He is the Food Stamp Prez who has half of Americans hooked on welfare.  He has all the stupid vote, which is a huge voting block in this country.Further, Romney is no more a Republican than McCain.  The Tea Party is going to stay home on 11/6 and focus instead on unthrowning Harry Reid.This will be an easy victory for Barry.

There is only one important thing now….. WHO can actually beat the socialist president?  Not Paul…… Not Newt……. not Perry…… not Santorum……. so who is it—- gosh, there ain’t but one left.  Now, we can all stay stupid or we can get rid of ObadOmen….. not really much of a choice anymore.

Romney is a liberal. The end. 

Is this the I was against Romney before I was for him who does nothing to hide her hatred of Newt, Ann? As much as she Flips & Flops Romney would be the perfect canidate for her. She needs to stick with gbtv where somebody might listen to her.

That’s your opinion and you’re certainly entitled to it, including the claim that all who don’t agree with you are stupid because we’re not happy with the MSM and the pundits picking our candidate for us.

Oooo. You’re pretty good!

It’s so nice to show Mikey how much you love him.

I can feel the love all the way in Chicago.

I bet Mikey is so happy now.

Oh Mike how witty you must be the twit with the sh!t.  Poo stain.

Yep. My rubbing your noses in your stupidity is all just cover for a secret homosexual lifestyle.

Right James? Tell them how it’s done, hombre.

Lester the molestor,

Occupy this you rat fink screwball nancy boy.

Hahahahahahahaahahahahaha

HASBRAINOT

What else has he done? I haven’t been following him since his
fox show went off, but I usually agree with most of what he has to say, just the fact that he is a Mormon and backing Santorum shows he is honest..but something isn’t adding up..

so are you and your black wife…Gypsy Rose Pee brain…

He’s been Governor of Texas for three terms how much more speaking skills does the guy need…LOL…

Speaking Texan don’t count

I hope you live a good long time, Stan, so that 30 years from now, you will see he still hasn’t answered you, LOL.

love it, Mike, funny!

Greetings from the OKCorral:
“Your federal government needs your money so that it can perform “vital” services for you that you would not think up for yourself in a million years”.  On the other hand, “don’t steal…the government hates competition”.
Old Gringo Ralph  (cites Dave Barry)

only male sheep, Mike…

Yeah he might be having a little too much conscience to be in the whole politics game and two parties have worked all this time…Three is a crowd..

Hey Mikey,

Did you see this?  Now there are 3 of them supporting you.

Damn all those extreme right wingers supporting an extreme left winger.

How could that happen, LOL?

Predictions made and repeated weekly (capitalization added for emphasis):

“Mittsies will fantasize endlessly about Mitt’s prospects for winning, his positioning, his character and ACHIEVEMENTS even as they personally disparage critics and criticism WITHOUT BENEFIT OF CORROBORATION OR SUBSTANTIATION other than their own assumed authority, generally rendered anonymously.  ”They will unswervingly respond to facts and substantive arguments about Mitt’s political and character flaws either by charging the purveyors of those facts and arguments with anti-Mormon bigotry, with taking facts and quotes out of context, with dishonesty, or with being secret evangelical or Obama agents. Or they will deflect or ignore.  ”They WILL SELDOM IF EVER OFFER ANY BACK-UP TO SUCH CLAIMS. They will virtually never show how something was taken out of context or has been doctored or misrepresented. TO ASK FOR S OURCING AND SUBSTANTIATION IS FUTILE.” 
For instance:
^TDO^
Leith,
Maybe you will be the Mitt supporter to finally answer a simple question.
Can you name one conservative thing that Mitt Romney has done as a politician?
DONE not said.
in reply to leithflood
DavidO
Balanced the MA budget, reduced property taxes, negotiated curbs on how far Romneycare would go (these have since been done away with by O’s buddy Deval and we now have the mess we have in MA today) the list goes on and on,  Just because you here otherwise does not mean it is true.
^TDO^
Let’s see,
HE balanced the budget?  With raising tons of fees,  capital gains tax increases, sales tax on internet purchases, etc.  he also reduced compensation to municipalities for state mandates.  That is how he ‘balanced’ the budget.
Property taxes went up almost 26% under Romney.
Until you can prove otherwise…
in reply to DavidO

I have to go to an appointment, I’ll leave these hasbarats in you and Mike’s capable hands!

THAT was not an election to be telling people that.

Yeah I’m still waiting on my refund for the 250,000 dollar cars I helped pay for that light your garage on fire…

They can’t see his Hasidic hairdo!  LOL!!!

I will vote for the winner of the primary.

Obama
VS
Whale excrement.

The Whale wins in a landslide.

That must make you Bi-Mutton. 

I think it’s interesting, that this conservative blog is always infested with neo-Nazis and fascists.

Why do you suppose that is, TooDamned? Why would self-proclaimed conservatives have fascist icons as avatars?

Oh wait, don’t tell me… Is it because Ann Coulter and Patrick Buchanan are secret liberals?

Hahahahahahahahahahaha

Mikey,

Because they come here to support you, as if you didn’t notice.

LOL